The Purpose of Yeshua's Death: Redeeming the Bride of Judah - Understanding the Torah of Jealousy

 

The death of Yeshua and the purpose behind it are widely talked about and theorized. There are many aspects to this execution that are worthy of ponderance and research, and today I have decided to share some insight I have gathered in regards to Messiah redeeming the bride. While the first time I touched on this topic the focus was on the House of Israel, today, the House of Judah will be the centerpiece, and how Yeshua took the punishment of the unfaithful wife’s place.  

The Torah of Jealousy

“And you, being dead in your trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He has made alive together with Him, having forgiven you all trespasses, having blotted out that which was written by hand against us – by the dogmas – which stood against us. And He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the stake.” (Colossians 2:13-14)

I have long understood this to be referring to the punishments we deserved for breaking the set-apart Torah.  However, the deeper understanding that I did not comprehend for a time is how this is a reference to the punishment of the adulterous wife, also called the law of jealousy.   In Numbers chapter five, we read about the process a husband could take if he suspected his wife of being unfaithful. One of the key steps is for the priest to write out the curses the adulterous wife would endure. 

“And יהוה spoke to Mosheh, saying, “Speak to the children of Yisra’ĕl, and say to them, ‘When any man’s wife turns aside and has committed a trespass against him, and a man has intercourse with her, and it is hidden from the eyes of her husband, and it is concealed that she has defiled herself, and there was no witness against her, nor was she caught, and a spirit of jealousy comes upon him and he becomes jealous of his wife who has defiled herself, or a spirit of jealousy comes upon him and he becomes jealous of his wife although she has not defiled herself, then the man shall bring his wife to the priest. And he shall bring the offering for her, one-tenth of an ĕphah of barley flour. He is not to pour oil on it or put frankincense on it, because it is a grain offering of jealousy, an offering for remembering, for bringing crookedness to remembrance. And the priest shall bring her near, and shall make her stand before יהוה.  And the priest shall take set-apart water in an earthen vessel, and take some of the dust that is on the floor of the Dwelling Place and put it into the water. And the priest shall make the woman stand before יהוה, and shall uncover the woman’s head, and put the offering for remembering in her hands, which is the grain offering of jealousy, while the priest holds in his hand the bitter water that brings a curse. “And the priest shall make her swear, and say to the woman If no man has lain with you, and if you have not turned aside to uncleanness under your husband’s authority, be free from this bitter water that brings a curse.But if you have turned aside under your husband’s authority, and if you have defiled yourself and some man other than your husband has lain with you” – then the priest shall make the woman swear with the oath of the curse, and he shall say to the woman – “יהוה make you a curse and an oath among your people, when יהוה makes your thigh waste away and your belly swell, and this water that causes the curse shall go into your inward parts, and make your belly swell and your thigh waste away.” And the woman shall say, “Amĕn, amĕn.And the priest shall write these curses in a book, and shall wipe them off into the bitter water, and shall make the woman drink the bitter water that brings the curse, and the water that brings the curse shall enter her to become bitter.” (Numbers 5:11-24)

At the end of this set of verses, we read about what was written against Judah that Paul is referencing in Colossians 2:13-14, that being the curses attributed to the adulterous wife. Another thing to keep in mind is that Elohim is a husband to Israel and is jealous when it comes to His people.

“Not like the covenant I made with their fathers in the day when I strengthened their hand to bring them out of the land of Mitsrayim, My covenant which they broke, though I was a husband to them,” declares יהוה.” (Jeremiah 31:32)

“For יהוה your Elohim is a consuming fire, a jealous Ěl.” (Deuteronomy 4:24)

Judah the Unfaithful

In part one, I discussed how the House of Israel was divorced and according to the Torah could not be remarried to Elohim, unless the husband died. For more information, please see my article “Redeeming the Bride.” Yet, Judah needed rescuing as well for while they were not divorced like Israel was, they were in many ways worse.  

“And it came to be, through her frivolous whoring, that she defiled the land and committed adultery with stones and wood. “And yet for all this her treacherous sister Yehuḏah has not turned to Me with all her heart, but falsely,” declares יהוה. And יהוה said to me, “Backsliding Yisra’ĕl has shown herself more righteous than treacherous Yehuḏah.” (Jeremiah 3:9-11)

With all this in mind, we can start to piece together how the Torah of Jealously comes into play between Judah and Yah. Even more so, how the punishments prescribed for the adulterous woman, mirror the afflictions Yeshua endured. 

The Cup of Bitter Waters

Remember that after the curses are written on a scroll they are wiped off in bitter water, which is later drank by the wife. This same principle was applied to Yeshua as well when he took Judah’s place. Starting with the symbolic drinking of the cup of bitter waters when Yeshua prayed in Gethsemane.

“And going forward a little, He fell on His face, and prayed, saying, “O My Father, if it is possible, let this cup pass from Me. Yet not as I desire, but as You desire.” (Matthew 26:39)

This is why Paul makes the following statement in 2 Corinthians. 

“For He made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us, so that in Him we might become the righteousness of Elohim.” (2 Corinthians 5:21)

Because he recognized that Yeshua had taken Judah’s place in the Torah of jealousy. Judah, the adulterous wife, had committed sin, but Yeshua took that role from Judah so that the House of Judah could be made righteous in front of Elohim.

A Curse Among His People

In Numbers 5:21, we read how the woman proven to be unfaithful would become a curse among her people and how they would denounce her. This is reflected in Yeshua when he died, and the people began to ridicule him. 

“And those passing by were blaspheming Him, shaking their heads.” (Matthew 27:39)

Thigh to Waste Away

In the scriptures, the thigh is symbolic of an individual’s integrity or authority. This is exemplified in the following passages.

“Then the servant put his hand under the thigh of Abraham his master, and swore to him concerning this matter.” (Genesis 24:9)

“And the time for Yisra’ĕl to die drew near, and he called his son Yosĕph and said to him, “Now if I have found favor in your eyes, please put your hand under my thigh, and show loving commitment and truth to me. Please do not bury me in Mitsrayim,” (Genesis 47:29)

“And out of His mouth goes a sharp sword, that with it He should smite the nations. And He shall shepherd them with a rod of iron. And He treads the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Ěl Shaddai. And on His robe and on His thigh He has a name written: SOVEREIGN OF SOVEREIGNS AND MASTER OF MASTERS.” (Revelation 19:15-16)

Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that the wasting away of the thigh would be the loss of authority or credibility. That is why, as Yeshua hung on the tree, the people mocked him for saying he was the son of Elohim. His credibility was lost among the masses.

“And those passing by were blaspheming Him, shaking their heads, and saying, “You who destroy the Dwelling Place and build it in three days, save Yourself! If You are the Son of Elohim, come down from the stake.” And likewise the chief priests, with the scribes and elders, mocking, said, “He saved others – He is unable to save Himself. If He is the Sovereign of Yisra’ĕl, let Him now come down from the stake, and we shall believe Him. He trusted in Elohim, let Him rescue Him now if He desires Him, for He said, ‘I am the Son of Elohim.” (Matthew 27:39-43)

The physical element of the thigh wasting away is the complete muscle failure Yeshua experienced while being crucified. During a crucifixion, the person could push up with their legs, giving them the ability to breathe. However, the longer a person hangs, the harder it becomes to sustain active muscle engagement. Try doing wall sits for an inkling of an idea. In time, Yeshua’s muscles in the thighs wasted away, and he was no longer able to keep himself up, and he gave up his spirit.

Abdomen to Swell

While the spiritual aspect of the abdomen swelling is currently lost on me, Yeshua, during the crucifixion, did experience physical swelling of the abdomen. As his lungs filled with fluid, they would have pressed on his stomach, forcing his abdomen to swell. This is most likely the reason why blood and water flowed forth from Yeshua when the Roman soldier stabbed his side.

“Therefore the soldiers came and broke the legs of the first, and of the other who was impaled with Him, but when they came to יהושע and saw that He was already dead, they did not break His legs. But one of the soldiers pierced His side with a spear, and instantly blood and water came out.” (John 19:32-34)

Conclusion

Yeshua’s crucifixion allowed for the House of Israel to be remarried to Elohim, and by taking the cup of bitterness from the House of Judah, he washed them clean of their adultery. It is by this alone that both houses can draw near to Yah, it is by his sacrifice that the fractured whole House of Israel can be made whole again. He is a role model for husbands to emulate, he is a High Priest perfect to intercede for us, and a King worthy of serving. 

P.S.

Check out some of my books! Available in both print and Kindle versions. 

Examining The Life Book: A Thoughtful Exploration

 Last month, while working on my article about the Good News of the Messiah, I received a thoughtful gift from a Baptist church: a little booklet. Though the person who gave it to me had good intentions, they did not realize that I do not stand on the right side of the river (Christianity) nor on the left side (Judaism), but see myself being in the river with the Messiah. 

Appreciating the gesture, I took it upon myself to examine the contents of the booklet, especially in light of my recent article. I wanted to determine whether its teachings aligned with the true Good News and other biblical topics or if they veered towards a different interpretation, as Peter and Paul had warned about.

Biblical Cosmology

Not directly related to the gospel, but a topic worth discussing. At the outset of the book, it asserts: 

“In the Bible, God says that everything He made was good. From massive galaxies soaked with shiny stars…”

However, this modern interpretation of the scriptures deviates from the cosmological framework presented in the scriptures. I have authored several articles delving into the subject of Biblical Cosmology, which you can find and read here.

Critique Number 1

“Snakes can’t be trusted. Satan (an angel who was kicked out of heaven when he tried to take over)…”

Snakes cannot be entirely dismissed as untrustworthy creatures. While some associate snakes with evil, it is important to note that the Seraphim, a class of angels, are described as serpentine beings. Moreover, the presence of snakes on Noah's Ark indicates that they have a place in the natural order, sanctioned by Elohim. And as shown below, snakes have been used to exemplify Elohim’s power. 

“And יהוה spoke to Mosheh (Moses) and to Aharon (Aaron), saying, When Pharaoh speaks to you, saying, ‘Show a miracle for yourselves,’ then you shall say to Aharon (Aaron), ‘Take your rod and throw it before Pharaoh, and let it become a serpent.’ So Mosheh (Moses) and Aharon(Aaron) went in to Pharaoh, and they did so, as יהוה commanded. And Aharon (Aaron) threw his rod before Pharaoh and before his servants, and it became a serpent. But Pharaoh also called the wise men and the practices of witchcraft. And they, the magicians of Mitsrayim (Egypt), also did so with their magic. And they, each one, threw down his rod, and they became serpents. But the rod of Aharon (Aaron) swallowed up their rods.” (Exodus 7:8-12)

Elohim could have had the staff turn into any animal but he chose for it to become a snake.

“And the people spoke against Elohim and against Mosheh (Moses), “Why have you brought us up out of Mitsrayim (Egypt) to die in the wilderness? For there is no food and no water, and our being loathes this light bread.” And יהוה sent fiery serpents among the people, and they bit the people. And many of the people of Yisra’ĕl (Israel) died. Then the people came to Mosheh (Moses), and said, “We have sinned, for we have spoken against יהוה and against you. Pray to יהוה to take away the serpents from us.” So Mosheh (Moses) prayed on behalf of the people. And יהוה said to Mosheh (Moses), “Make a fiery serpent, and set it on a pole. And it shall be that everyone who is bitten, when he looks at it, shall live.” So Mosheh (Moses) made a bronze serpent, and put it on a pole. And it came to be, if a serpent had bitten anyone, when he looked at the bronze serpent, he lived.” (Numbers 21:5-9)

In this instance, Yah uses snakes to reprimand His people, and then instructs Moses to create a bronze serpent so that the people may be healed upon looking at it. Snakes are not evil, dangerous, sure, but they serve a purpose. Furthermore, in my article titled "Was the Serpent Really Satan?" I delve into the intricacies of the Hebrew term used in Genesis chapter 3, where the word 'Nahash' can also signify Seraphim. This exploration sheds light on the multifaceted nature of scriptural language and its potential for deeper interpretations. Additionally, I present evidence in the same article that suggests Hasatan (referring to Satan) has not been cast out of heaven at the time of the events in Genesis, as later biblical references, including those in Revelation, indicate he still retains access to heaven and even participates in heavenly conflicts.

Critique Number 2

“In that one bite, trust was shattered…as a result, evil (sin) entered into the perfect world.”

“Because of their sin, death entered the world.”

“Sin was now between them.”

As we progress on this journey, it becomes essential to clarify our terms, especially at the beginning of this book. The Life Book, however, has chosen to maintain a vague definition of sin. Although it acknowledges sin as a breach of trust, an embodiment of evil, and a path leading to death and separation from the Father, it does not precisely define what sin entails. This lack of definition leaves the concept of sin open to interpretation, a trend that can be found in many Christian works. 

To gain a deeper understanding of sin, we turn to the Bible, which clearly defines sin as the transgression of the Torah. The Torah represents the Father's set-apart instructions for righteous living, providing a path to follow that leads us to walk in His ways and receive His blessings.

“Everyone who commits sin also breaks the law (Torah); sin is the breaking of law (Torah).” (1 John 3:4)

Torah is the instructions for righteous living given by the Father.

“See, I have set before you today life and good, and death and evil,” in that I am commanding you today to love יהוה your Elohim, to walk in His ways, and to guard His commands, and His laws, and His right-rulings. And you shall live and increase, and יהוה your Elohim shall bless you in the land which you go to possess.” (Deuteronomy 30:15-16)

The very first command given, as recorded in the Bible, was not to eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. This command highlights the importance of adhering to God's ways and avoiding disobedience. The last quote pulled for this section:

“Because the flood did not break the curse, sin and rebellion against God’s ways started all over again.”

Comes close to defining sin, but ultimately does not explain what the ways of Elohim are. Sin, the transgression of the Torah, led to separation from the Father and the introduction of death. As we continue on this exploration, we should seek to comprehend the significance of following Elohim's ways, which were outlined in the Torah, and understand the profound effects of sin on humanity and the world.

Critique Number 3

“God gave Moses 10 laws…”

It is crucial to dispel a common misconception propagated by some interpretations within Christianity. Yah indeed gave Moses more than just ten laws or commandments. A closer examination of Exodus chapter twenty reveals that Elohim spoke the Ten Words audibly for everyone to hear, not exclusively for Moses. However, the magnitude of this divine manifestation was so awe-inspiring that it overwhelmed the people, leading them to express fear and reluctance to hear further. 

“And all the people saw the thunders, the lightning flashes, the voice of the shophar, and the mountain smoking. And the people saw it, and they trembled and stood at a distance, and said to Mosheh, “You speak with us and we hear, but let not Elohim speak with us, lest we die.” And Mosheh said to the people, “Do not fear, for Elohim has come to prove you, and in order that His fear be before you, so that you do not sin.” So the people stood at a distance, but Mosheh drew near the thick darkness where Elohim was.” (Exodus 20:18-21)

Following the grand encounter with Elohim, Moses ascended the mountain and received additional instructions on how to live, beyond the Ten Words. It is essential to clarify that the notion of the "Ten Commandments" as a standalone entity is misleading. These statements are, in fact, integral to the marriage covenant forged between Yah and His people. In the scripture, they are not referred to as the "Ten Commandments" but rather as the words of the covenant.

“And he was there with יהוה forty days and forty nights. He did not eat bread and he did not drink water. And He wrote on the tablets the Words of the covenant, the Ten Words.” (Exodus 34:28)

It is essential to emphasize that the Ten Words are not to be viewed in isolation from the rest of the Torah. They should not be perceived as exclusively universal or moral commands, while the remaining parts of the Torah are considered archaic or less relevant, as some interpretations within Christianity might suggest. Instead, the Ten Words serve as a foundational expression, capturing the essence of the covenant between Yah and His people.

The rest of the Torah, comprising the detailed instructions and teachings, serves to elaborate on and provide practical application of these fundamental principles found in the Ten Words. Together, the entirety of the Torah forms a cohesive and comprehensive guide for righteous living, outlining the set-apart principles and precepts that underpin the covenantal relationship with Yah. It is through understanding and following both the essence of the Ten Words and the elaborations in the Torah that we gain a holistic perspective on how to live in alignment with Yah's will.

Critique Number 4

Yeshua’s Sacrifice

I have not included specific references in this passage as they would require listing several sentences. However, the references can be found in the following subsections: "Blood Payment" and "The Promise."

In line with observations about Christianity, it is evident that there is often a failure to fully comprehend or acknowledge the profound reasons behind Yeshua's coming, death, and subsequent role as the eternal high priest in the heavenly tabernacle. Regrettably, his sacrifice is frequently reduced to catchphrases that fail to encapsulate the entire essence of the verses they reference. For instance, the common phrase "He died to save you from your sins" only scratches the surface and does not fully capture the deep significance and multifaceted aspects of Yeshua's sacrifice.

It is vital to understand that Yeshua's primary mission was to seek and save the lost sheep of the house of Israel. This singular focus is of utmost importance in comprehending the purpose and scope of his ministry. 

“And He answering, said, “I was not sent except to the lost sheep of the house of Yisra’ĕl (Israel).” (Matthew 15:24)

The reason behind this lies in the fact that the house of Israel was divorced. According to the Torah, once a wife is divorced and defiled by another, it becomes impossible for the former husband and wife to be remarried. This circumstance creates a significant barrier to reconciliation and restoration between them. 

“When a man takes a wife and shall marry her, then it shall be, if she finds no favor in his eyes because he has found a matter of uncoveredness in her, and he shall write her a certificate of divorce, and put it in her hand, and send her out of his house, and if she left his house and went and became another man’s wife, and the latter husband shall hate her and write her a certificate of divorce, and put it in her hand, and send her out of his house, or when the latter husband dies who took her to be his wife, then her former husband who sent her away is not allowed to take her back to be his wife after she has been defiled, for that would be an abomination before יהוה. And do not bring sin on the land which יהוה your Elohim is giving you as an inheritance.” (Deuteronomy 24:1-4)

As we know, Yah entered a covenantal marriage with Israel, forming a sacred bond. However, over time, the nation of Israel divided into two kingdoms, known as the house of Israel and Judah. Tragically, due to their continued disobedience and waywardness, Yah felt compelled to divorce the house of Israel. This unfortunate outcome resulted from their failure to uphold the covenant and follow His righteous ways. 

“And יהוה said to me in the days of Yoshiyahu (Josiah) the sovereign, “Have you seen what backsliding Yisra’ĕl (Israel) has done? She has gone up on every high mountain and under every green tree, and there committed whoring. “And after she had done all these, I said ‘Return to Me.’ But she did not return. And her treacherous sister Yehuḏah (Judah) saw it. “And I saw that for all the causes for which backsliding Yisra’ĕl (Israel) had committed adultery, I had put her away and given her a certificate of divorce; yet her treacherous sister Yehuḏah (Judah) did not fear, but went and committed whoring too.” (Jeremiah 3:6-8)

This situation poses a significant predicament for the house of Israel because, according to the Torah, they are prohibited from being remarried (reentering the covenant) with Yah. However, there is a crucial aspect to consider—this prohibition only lasts as long as the former husband is alive. In other words, the barrier to reconciliation and return for the house of Israel exists only within a specific time frame while the former husband is still alive. This distinction provides a glimmer of hope for their eventual reconciliation with Yah. 

“Or do you not know, brothers – for I speak to those knowing the Torah – that the Torah rules over a man as long as he lives? For the married woman has been bound by Torah to the living husband, but if the husband dies, she is released from the Torah concerning her husband. So then, while her husband lives, she shall be called an adulteress if she becomes another man’s. But if her husband dies, she is free from that part of the Torah, so that she is not an adulteress, having become another man’s. So my brothers, you also were put to death to the Torah through the body of Messiah, for you to become another’s, the One who was raised from the dead, that we should bear fruit to Elohim.” (Romans 7:1-4)

Yeshua, the husband to both Israel and Judah, made the ultimate sacrifice by giving his life to pave the way for the house of Israel's reconciliation with the Father (Read "Redeeming the Bride" to learn more). This was the primary purpose of Yeshua's coming—to provide a path for the house of Israel to return to the divine fold. Through enduring trials and challenges, Yeshua became a High Priest who can genuinely empathize with humanity, understanding our struggles and weaknesses. His role as the compassionate High Priest is a testament to his love and devotion in guiding us back to the Father. 

“For we do not have a High Priest unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but One who was tried in all respects as we are, apart from sin.” (Hebrews 4:15)

Regarding the role of High Priest, it is crucial to recognize that Yeshua is currently fulfilling that position in the heavens. However, this aspect is often overlooked by many people. Throughout history, the priesthood has consistently carried the burden of the people's sins, and this is precisely what Yeshua has done and continues to do for the covenanted community.

As the ultimate High Priest, Yeshua bears the weight of our sins, interceding on behalf of the faithful. His sacrificial act and ongoing role as the High Priest offer redemption and atonement, exemplifying his unwavering dedication to those who have entered a covenant with the Father.

 “Because the Lĕwites shall do the service of the Tent of Appointment, so they themselves bear their crookedness. A law forever, throughout your generations: that among the children of Yisra’ĕl they are to have no inheritance.” (Numbers 18:23)

“He would see the result of the suffering of His life and be satisfied. Through His knowledge My righteous Servant makes many righteous, and He bears their crookednesses. Therefore, I give Him a portion among the great, and He divides the spoil with the strong, because He poured out His being unto death, and He was counted with the transgressors, and He bore the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors.” (Isaiah 53: 11-12)

Yeshua holds the esteemed position of the King High Priest of Israel, and the remarkable aspect is that anyone can become a part of Elohim's kingdom. Does not matter if you were born a gentile, you can die a Hebrew, with Yeshua as your Master.

As always, I encourage you to test everything, including these teachings, and may the Ruach Hakodesh (the Holy Spirit) guide you into all truth.

P.S.

Check out some of my books! Available in both print and Kindle versions.

Understanding the Good News of Yeshua: A Deeper Look at His Teachings

 

What is the Good News of Yeshua?

There is a distinction that needs to be made between the Good News of Yeshua and the Good News about Yeshua. The Good News of Yeshua refers to the gospel he taught, while the Good News about Yeshua pertains to his coming, death, burial, resurrection, and his second coming. Today, I choose to focus on the Good News of Yeshua because most people are already aware of the Good News about him. By neglecting the gospel of Yeshua, we fail to understand the true Good news of the scriptures.

It is important to recognize that these two aspects are not one and the same. For many, the gospel is centered around the death, burial, and resurrection of Yeshua. However, this is not the Good News that Yeshua himself taught, as his disciples were caught off guard when he spoke about his impending death.

“And taking the twelve aside, He said to them, “See, we are going up to Yerushalayim (Jerusalem), and all that has been written by the prophets about the Son of Aḏam shall be accomplished. “For He shall be delivered up to the nations and shall be mocked and insulted and spat upon, “and having flogged Him they shall kill Him. And on the third day He shall rise again. But they understood none of this, and this word was hidden from them, and they did not know what was being said.” (Luke 18:31-34)

“And as they were coming down from the mountain, He ordered them not to relate to anyone what they saw, till the Son of Aḏam had risen from the dead. And they kept this matter to themselves, debating what the rising from the dead meant.” (Mark 9:9-10)

“And going from there they passed through Galil. And He did not wish anyone to know, for He was teaching His taught ones and said to them, “The Son of Aḏam is being delivered into the hands of men, and they shall kill Him. And having been killed, He shall rise the third day.” But they did not understand the word, and they were afraid to ask Him.” (Mark 9:30-32)

The disciples struggled to grasp the meaning of the Master's words, and it is worth noting that he chose to share this information with them privately, away from public knowledge. Several chapters later, Yeshua is depicted teaching the Good News, which implies that this message couldn't have been solely about his death, as mentioned earlier. 

“And it came to be, on one of those days, as He was teaching the people in the Set-apart Place and bringing the Good News, that the chief priests and the scribes, together with the elders, came up.” (Luke 20:1)

This is the same Good News that Yeshua himself instructed his disciples to go out and teach way back in Luke chapter 9. 

“And as for those who do not receive you, when you go out of that city, shake off the dust from your feet as a witness against them.” And going out they went through the villages, bringing the Good News and healing everywhere.” (Luke 9:5-6)

It would not be until chapter 18 that Yeshua disclosed his fate to his closest disciples, which further illustrates that the Good News Yeshua taught and told his disciples to teach was not about his death, burial, and resurrection. 

If the gospel Yeshua taught was not about his death, burial, and resurrection, then what was it? Well, according to the author of Hebrews, it was the very same Good News given to the people who left Egypt.

“For who, having heard, rebelled? Was it not all who came out of Mitsrayim (Egypt), led by Mosheh (Moses)? And with whom was He grieved forty years? Was it not with those who sinned, whose corpses fell in the wilderness? And to whom did He swear that they would not enter into His rest, but to those who did not obey? So we see that they were unable to enter in because of unbelief.” (Hebrews 3:16-19)

“Therefore, since a promise remains of entering into His rest, let us fear lest any of you seem to have come short of it. For indeed the Good News was brought to us as well as to them, but the word which they heard did not profit them, not having been mixed with belief in those who heard it.” (Hebrews 4:1-2)

We have received the very same Good News as those who were led out of Egypt, that being entering into a covenant with the almighty Elohim if we agree to do all that He says, i.e., keeping Torah. But take note that those in the wilderness did not profit from this because they did not trust in Elohim, as seen in the connection between rebellion, sin, disobedience, and unbelief.

“Since then it remains for some to enter into it, and those who formerly received the Good News did not enter in because of disobedience.” (Hebrews 4:6)

Yeshua Taught the Torah

We know that the Messiah taught a Torah observant lifestyle as evident in the following verses.

“Do not think that I came to destroy the Torah or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to complete. For truly, I say to you, till the heaven and the earth pass away, one yod or one tittle shall by no means pass from the Torah till all be done. “Whoever, then, breaks one of the least of these commands, and teaches men so, shall be called least in the reign of the heavens; but whoever does and teaches them, he shall be called great in the reign of the heavens. For I say to you, that unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you shall by no means enter into the reign of the heavens.” (Matthew 5:17-20)

Messiah himself said do not think he came to destroy the Torah, therefore do not let that thought enter your mind!

“Then יהושע spoke to the crowds and to His taught ones, saying, “The scribes and the Pharisees sit on the seat of Mosheh. Therefore, whatever they say to you to guard, guard and do. But do not do according to their works, for they say, and do not do.” (Matthew 23:1-3)

When the scribes and Pharisees sat in the seat of Moses, they taught the Torah, but they did not practice what they preached and instead upheld the oral torah, which we now know as the Talmud. For more examples, please check out my “Torah” page.

Let’s examine a few mentions in the writings of the disciples and apostles about the good news, and see if it aligns with our interpretation.

Peter on the Gospel

“Therefore, having girded up the loins of your mind, being sober, set your expectation perfectly upon the favor that is to be brought to you at the revelation of יהושע Messiah, as obedient children, not conforming yourselves to the former lusts in your ignorance, instead, as the One who called you is set-apart, so you also should become set-apart in all behavior, because it has been written, “Be set-apart, for I am set-apart.” And if you call on the Father, who without partiality judges according to each one’s work, pass the time of your sojourning in fear, Knowing that you were redeemed from your futile behavior inherited from your fathers, not with what is corruptible, silver or gold, but with the precious blood of Messiah, as of a lamb unblemished and spotless, foreknown, indeed, before the foundation of the world, but manifested in these last times for your sakes, who through Him believe in Elohim who raised Him from the dead and gave Him esteem, so that your belief and expectation are in Elohim. Now that you have cleansed your lives in obeying the truth through the Spirit to unfeigned brotherly love, love one another fervently with a clean heart, having been born again – not of corruptible seed, but incorruptible – through the living Word of Elohim, which remains forever, because “All flesh is as grass, and all the esteem of man as the flower of the grass. The grass withers, and its flower falls away, but the Word of Elohim remains forever.” And this is the Word, announced as Good News to you.” (1 Peter 1:13-25)

The divine word of Elohim is embodied in the Torah, His righteous instructions that guide us to live a life pleasing to Him. While the redemptive act of the Messiah's sacrifice and the shedding of his precious blood is indeed good news, it is important to understand that the Good News proclaimed by the Messiah, as mentioned by Peter, did not solely revolve around his death, burial, and resurrection. Rather, it focused on the proper path to the Father's heart, which is through the observance of the Torah. It is essential to recognize that Yeshua himself is the embodiment of the Torah in human form. This passage of scripture highlights Peter's message that we have been granted a fresh start. The old ways of living in the flesh are rendered obsolete for those who have been born again and are now willing and ready to live as obedient children. This transformation is indeed good news!

Paul’s Writings on the Good News

“But brothers, I make known to you the Good News, which I brought as Good News to you, which you also did receive, and in which you stand, through which also you are being saved, if you hold fast that word I brought as Good News to you. Otherwise, you have believed in vain. For I delivered to you at the first that which I also received: that Messiah died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that He was buried, and that He was raised the third day, according to the Scriptures.” (1 Corinthians 15: 1-4)

The death, burial, and resurrection of the Messiah are undeniably good news, but it is crucial to understand why they hold such significance. They represent the starting point of the restoration process for the lost sheep of the House of Israel, as Yeshua himself affirmed. This pivotal event symbolizes the opportunity for reconciliation and redemption, offering hope and a way for the scattered Israelites to be brought back into a renewed covenant relationship with their Creator. 

“And He answering, said, “I was not sent except to the lost sheep of the house of Yisra’ĕl (Israel).” (Matthew 15:24)

The Good News should not be understood through the lens of Christianity's perception, where the death of the Messiah is seen as a license to live according to personal preferences. It is not about selectively following certain commandments while dismissing others as archaic or coming from an angry deity. Rather, the Good News is intertwined with the gathering of the lost sheep, a process made possible by the death of the Messiah (bringing redemption to the Bride). This concept is echoed by Paul, who mentions it in the following passage: 

“Therefore, remember that you, once nations in the flesh, who are called ‘the uncircumcision’ by what is called ‘the circumcision’ (the pharisees) made in the flesh by hands that at that time you were without Messiah, excluded from the citizenship of Yisra’ĕl and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no expectation and without Elohim in the world. But now in Messiah יהושע you who once were far off have been brought near by the blood of the Messiah. For He is our peace, who has made both one, and having broken down the partition of the barrier.” (Ephesians 2:11-14)

What was the barrier? It was the understanding that the divorced House of Israel could not return while their husband was still alive (Redeeming the Bride). Gentiles were never prohibited from joining Israel, as there are numerous examples in the Tanach (Grafted In). However, the divorced Israelites, who were separated from Elohim, faced a specific barrier. This is why the Good News that Paul refers to a few verses later is rooted in the prophecy that healing and restoration would come to all of Israel. 

“And having come, He brought as Good News peace to you who were far off, and peace to those near.” (Ephesians 2:17)

“I have seen his ways, but now I heal him, and I lead him, and restore comforts to him and to his mourners, creating the fruit of the lips: peace, peace to him who is far off and to him who is near,” said יהוה, “and I shall heal him.” (Isaiah 57:18-19)

With all this in mind, let us read Paul’s warning about accepting a false gospel, and ruminate on what that could be.

“For, indeed, if he who is coming proclaims another יהושע, whom we have not proclaimed, or if you receive a different spirit which you have not received, or a different Good News which you have not accepted, you put up with it well enough!” (2 Corinthians 11:4)

“I marvel that you are so readily turning away from Him who called you in the favor of Messiah, to a different ‘Good News,’ which is not another, only there are some who are troubling you and wishing to pervert the Good News of Messiah. However, even if we, or a messenger out of heaven, bring a ‘Good News’ to you beside what we announced to you, let him be accursed. As we have said before, and now I say again, if anyone brings a ‘Good News’ to you beside what you have received, let him be accursed.” (Galatians 1:6-9)

Furthermore, the gospel preached by the Christian Church often promotes a message of disobedience through the lens of the Messiah's death. Moreover, they tend to vehemently criticize those who choose to follow Yeshua by obeying the Torah and living in accordance with the Father's will. The gospel they proclaim cannot be actively obeyed but is rather centered around a belief system (e.g., believing in Jesus Christ and his sacrifice for one's sins is all there is). However, the true Good News encompasses both belief and action. As demonstrated throughout this article, and finally with Paul and Peter themselves, the genuine Good News of the Kingdom of Elohim involves active participation and obedience to the Father's commands..

“In flaming fire taking vengeance on those who do not know Elohim, and on those who do not obey the Good News of our Master יהושע Messiah.” (2 Thessalonians 1:8)

“Because it is time for judgment to begin from the House of Elohim. And if firstly from us, what is the end of those who do not obey the Good News of Elohim?” (1 Peter 4:17)

Continue to test all things, including this article, and I pray that the Ruach Hakodesh leads you into all truth.

P.S.

Check out some of my books! Available in both print and Kindle versions.

Uncovering St. Patrick's True Identity: A Hebrew and Torah-Observant Man in Ireland

 

Once again, my studies have brought me to the British Isles (a geographical term which does not imply that Ireland belongs to Great Britain). My first foray into the Isles was documented in my article "Wales and the Lost Tribes of Israel," and as it happens, Maewyn, Patrick's birth name, has Welsh origins.

Now, my research has taken me to the Emerald Island, where I have discovered a recurring pattern throughout history: the manipulation of a person's true identity to fit a specific narrative. This phenomenon occurred with Yeshua and Paul and how they are presented in the Christian Church.

In this case, I am delving into the records to uncover the true person behind St. Patrick. Contrary to popular belief, the celebrated saint was not Catholic but was, in fact, born a Hebrew. His family likely settled in the British Isles following the siege of Jerusalem. 

“The learned declare that he was of the Jews by origin, since it is manifest from the miracles which God wrought for him, that he was of the children of Israel, for of them were the Jews besides. For when the vengeance was inflicted by Titus and Vespasian, the Jews were scattered throughout the world, and Patrick’s original kindred came to Britain…” (Lives of Saints from the Book of Lismore. United States, AMS Press, 1890. pg. 150)

“Patrick may have been descended from the Sons of Israel. When the Sons of Israel were banished by Titus and Vespasian into slavery to the four corners of the world in revenge for the blood of Christ, his ancestors came to Britain.” (Book Of Leinster, 1160.)

“The links must account for the Hebrew quality of Irish monasticism, for modern Jewish authorities affirm that the remaining remnants of the Samaritan sect represent the purest form of the ancient Hebrew stock. The Samaritans were part of the northern tribes of Israel and their capital, Shechem was destroyed by Vespasian in 70 A.D. Since St. Patrick is said to be the descendant of an Israelite family who were scattered by Vespasian and Titus “in bondage throughout the four quarters of the world” and who came to Britain, it is possible that Patrick himself was of Samaritan ancestry.” (Boswell, Winthrop Palmer. The Roots of Irish Monasticism. United States, San Francisco State College., 1969. pg. 64-65)

Before moving on, there are three important points to note from the quotes mentioned. Firstly, it is worth considering why some Jews who fled Judea ended up in the British Isles. It is unlikely that they simply closed their eyes and pointed to a spot on the map. In my previous article, "Wales and the Lost Tribes of Israel," I argued that some of the northern tribes, specifically the House of Israel, may have found their way to the British Isles after being divorced and kicked out of their land.

Secondly, in the Book of Leinster, it is suggested that the Jewish people were exiled from Israel for killing Yeshua. While true in a sense, it was Rome that had killed Yeshua, and it's also important to remember that thousands of Jewish people were among his followers, and he himself was Jewish, as were his disciples. The writer of the Book of Leinster seems to be pushing a narrative that suggests the Jews (specifically, those of the House of Judah) are completely against the Messiah.

Thirdly, in "The Roots of Irish Monasticism," the author suggests that Maewyn may have been from Samaria, a region whose inhabitants are said to be descendants of the northern tribes that were not exiled from Israel after Assyria's conquest. This would make Maewyn a Hebrew by blood but not a Jew. For more information, please refer to my article "Israel and Judah".

Ireland and the Torah

Continuing with The Roots of Irish Monasticism, the author goes on to say,  

“Israelitish features in Irish monasticism include the use of an Eastern type liturgy visible in the Antiphonary if Bangor, the festal observance of Saturday in the same manner as the Jews, evidence for a Pharisaic observance of Sunday, the prominence of Hebrew features in Irish canon law collections (including Biblical Cities of Refuge and Jubilee Years), together with Mosaic prohibitions on diet, and injunctions on tithes likewise Hebraic in inspiration. There was also a Hebrew treatment of the sanctuary as already noted in the case of St. Columbanus, and finally there were numerous Hebrew words occurring in cryptographic monastic Irish works such as Hisperica Famina.” (Boswell, Winthrop Palmer. The Roots of Irish Monasticism. United States, San Francisco State College., 1969. pg. 64-65)

Historians have pointed out the similarities between the Celtic/Gaelic and Hebrew languages over the years. In Acts chapter 29, we find a possible explanation for this phenomenon. It is suggested that the Celts, to some degree, retained their ancient ways of keeping Torah.

Maewyn is credited with bringing the truth of Yeshua and Torah to Ireland. However, this was only after he had spent six years there as a slave. After regaining his freedom, he returned to Ireland and shared the powerful and life-changing message of Elohim. This is why there are so many references to Ireland and the Celts in general doing things in a Hebrew manner. 

“The Celts used a Latin Bible unlike the Vulgate, and kept Saturday as a day of rest, with special religious services on Sunday.” The Rise of the Mediaeval Church and Its Influence on the Civilization of Western Europe from the First to the Thirteenth Century. United States, B. Franklin, Flick, Alexander Clarence. 1909. pg. 237)

“It seems to have been customary in the Celtic churches of early times, in Ireland as well as Scotland, to keep Saturday, the Jewish Sabbath, as a day of rest from labor, and Sunday, commemorative of the Lord’s resurrection, as one of rejoicing, with exercises of public worship. In that case they obeyed the fourth commandment literally upon the seventh day of the week—the day on which the Lord lay in the grave—and did not understand the precept about resting from labor to apply to the day of rejoicing over his resurrection.” The Church in Scotland: A History of Its Antecedents, it Conflicts, and Its Advocates, from the Earliest Recorded Times to the First Assembly of the Reformed Church. United States, Presbyterian Board of Education, Moffat, James Clement. 1882. pg.140)

To correct a common misconception, the Sabbath is not Jewish; it belongs to Yah. However, it is not surprising that many historians and academics refer to anything Hebrew as Jewish, even in the case of Abraham, who was born before the existence of the tribe of Judah.

“A central feature [of the Celtic churches] was the profound respect for the authority of the Scripture, and a strong emphasis on the legal aspects of the Old Testament. The Liber ex Lege Moisi survives in four manuscripts of Irish origin, dating from c. 800 (Hardinge 1972, 50). It consists of a series of texts of Old Testament law, covering a variety of topics and situations. The work expresses an unstated assumption that Old Testament law was a prime directive for the proper conduct of everyday life. Hardinge cites a series of parallels between Celtic Christian practices and those of the Old Testament, in which the Celtic is a much closer variant of the original than anything surviving in the other branches of Christianity. The shared elements include the keeping of the Saturday Sabbath, tithing, the definition of “first fruits” and offerings, the establishment of walled precincts for the priestly/monastic families, inheritance of religious office, and fasting and dietary restrictions.” (St Joseph in Britain: Reconsidering the Legends. Part 2. Deborah K. E. Crawford. Folklore, vol. 105, 1994, pp. 51–59. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/1260629)

Maewyn and his disciple Columba were known for teaching the entire Bible, not just the small portion found at the back of the book. This stands in stark contrast to how Christianity is often taught by modern preachers and teachers. 

“Following the example Patrick, Columba and Celtic Christians for centuries made the Scriptures the foundation for their studies.” (The Celtic Church in Britain. Hardinge. pg. 30)

“…Columba was likewise credited with teaching “the books of the Law completely…” (The Celtic Church in Britain. Hardinge. pg. 50)

“…the Celtic Church began when Sabbath observance had not been relinquished by Christians at large…These traditions persisted for more than two centuries after the saint’s death.” (The Celtic Church in Britain. United Kingdom, S.P.C.K. for the Church Historical Society, Hardinge, Leslie. 1972. pg. 78)

If the historical Maeywn was a Torah-keeping follower of Yeshua, then how did Saint Patrick come about? Unfortunately, it is difficult for a person to defend themselves or speak out against false accusations once they have passed away. 

“Two centuries elapsed after Patrick’s death before any writer attempted to connect Patrick’s work with a papal commission. No pope ever mentioned him, neither is there anything in the ecclesiastical records of Rome concerning him.” (Truth Triumphant: The Church in the Wilderness. United States, Hartland Publications, Wilkinson, Benjamin George. 2004. pg. 81)

The Roman Church, or Christianity, waited until Maewyn, his disciple Columba, and all those who knew him had passed away before they began to rewrite history to fit their own narrative. Regrettably, this practice has been applied to many figures throughout history, including one who is now relegated to the realm of fantasy. 

Rome vs the Torah

When Constantine made Christianity the main religion of Rome, his intention was not to follow Yah as Yeshua did, but to use his own means. He merged pagan practices and festivals with Christian beliefs, such as Christmas, Easter, Halloween, and Valentine's Day.

I believe that Satan is actively working to manipulate the Roman-rooted church and erase the true history of those who followed Yeshua. This includes renaming certain groups and altering the characteristics of individuals such as Maewyn, erasing the parts of him that made him who he was.

The British Isles, perhaps because of their distance from Rome, did not immediately submit to the religious mandate. It would take centuries for Roman missionaries and monks to finally convert the Isles. However, these church officials had much to say about the region. 

“The Britains are against the entire world. They are hostile toward the Roman customs, not only in the Mass, but also on their tonsure, serving with the Jews in the shadow rather than the truth.” (St. Joseph In Britain: Reconsidering The Legends, Part 2 as originally published in Folklore Vol. 105, 1994)

“If one flouts the Council of Nicaea and keeps Easter with the Jews on the fourteenth of the moon, he shall be driven out of every church unless he does penance before his death.” (Medieval Handbooks of Penance: A Translation of the Principal "libri Poenitentiales" and Selections from Related Documents. United States, Columbia University Press, McNeill, John Thomas, and Gamer, Helena Margaret. 1938. pg. 188)

Maewyn’s Supposed Confessio

This letter has been attributed to Maewyn himself, but upon closer examination and taking a holistic approach to analyzing the document, it can only be concluded that this letter was not written by Maewyn and was most likely used by the Catholic Church to push their agenda. The Church wanted to turn him into a Catholic saint and used the letter to show that he had no issue with eating pork, a well-known method used by the Inquisition in identifying Jews. In the letter, Saint Patrick details being on a long journey with a group of companions who were on the brink of starvation when their prayers were answered by a herd of pigs. 

“And with God's help this came to pass; and behold, a herd of swine appeared on the road before our eyes, and they slew many of them, and remained there for two nights, and the were full of their meat and well restored, for many of them had fainted and would otherwise have been left half dead by the wayside.” (Confessio, attributed to Saint Patrick of Ireland.)

Now that we have gathered evidence showing that the Celtic people, including Maewyn, were Torah observant to some degree, we can see how this is problematic. Moreover, the church of Ireland, which Maewyn is credited with founding, followed many of the Torah's teachings, including the dietary instructions. 

“The rules of the Old Testament which shaped the theocracy of Israel were followed by the Celts as a natural consequence of their view of biblical authority. The role of the Liber ex Lege Moisi was paramount. The laws defining clean and unclean animals which might or might not be used as food, the methods of slaughtering animals, the advice on hygiene applying to both men and women, the Levirite marriage, the precepts modifying usury and slavery, the treatment of widows and orphans, as well as the payment of tithes and the offerings of first fruits, all were thought necessary.” (The Celtic Church in Britain. Hardinge. pg. 202)

Conclusion

Maewyn Succat was a man whose true attributes have been forgotten by many. His morals have been erased and reformatted to fit an agenda. Rather than being recognized as someone who brought the Torah and the message of Yeshua to Ireland, he is falsely remembered as the one who brought Catholicism to the Celts, his memory reduced to nothing more than a drinking holiday celebrated with green beer.

I hope you have enjoyed this little journey, and I beseech each one of you to do your own research on the matter. May the Ruach Hakodesh lead you into all truth.

P.S.

Check out some of my books! Available in both print and Kindle versions. 

Was the Serpent Really Satan? Unpacking the Biblical Evidence

“And the naḥash was more crafty than all the lives of the field which יהוה Elohim had made, and he said to the woman, “Is it true that Elohim has said, ‘Do not eat of every tree of the garden’?” (Genesis 3:1)

In Genesis 3:1, we read about the Nahash, who was craftier than all the creatures of the field created by Elohim. He is also known as the serpent who deceived Eve into eating from the Tree of Knowledge. But was the Nahash just a mere snake or something else entirely?

The Hebrew word used for Nahash can be translated as serpent, snake, image (of serpent), or fleeing serpent (mythological/ or perhaps more than myth). In Numbers 21:6 and Deuteronomy 8:15, we see the same word translated as fiery serpents, which were sent by Yahweh to punish the Israelites for their rebellion.

“And יהוה sent fiery serpents among the people, and they bit the people. And many of the people of Yisra’ĕl died.” (Numbers 21:6)

“Who led you through that great and awesome wilderness – fiery serpents and scorpions and thirst – where there was no water, who brought water for you out of the flinty rock, (Deuteronomy 8:15)

In Isaiah 27:1, Nahash is also used to describe Leviathan, a creature far superior in terms of size and ability to the average snake. Here, Leviathan is referred to as a fleeing serpent (nahash).

“In that day יהוה with His severe sword, great and strong, punishes Liwiathan the fleeing serpent, Liwiathan that twisted serpent. And He shall kill the monster that is in the sea.” (Isaiah 27:1)

Interestingly, the root word for Nahash, nâchash, naw-khash', means to practice divination, observe signs, learn by experience, practice fortunetelling, whisper a spell, or take as an omen. It implies that Nahash is associated with supernatural abilities and may not be just an ordinary creature.

In 1 Samuel 15:23, rebellion is compared to the sin of divination, which is rooted in Nahash, which also means serpent. This suggests that Nahash has a deeper spiritual connotation beyond its physical meaning.

“For rebellion is as the sin of divination, and stubbornness is as wickedness and idolatry. Because you have rejected the word of יהוה, He also does reject you as sovereign.” (1 Samuel 15:23)

In the book of Revelation, Satan is referred to as the dragon, the serpent of old, who deceived or enchanted Eve in the Garden of Eden. This means that Nahash, the serpent who deceived Eve, was Satan in disguise. 

“And there came to be fighting in the heaven: Miḵa’ĕl and his messengers fought against the dragon. And the dragon and his messengers fought, but they were not strong enough, nor was a place found for them in the heaven any longer. And the great dragon was thrown out, that serpent of old, called the Devil and Satan, who leads all the world astray. He was thrown to the earth, and his messengers were thrown out with him.” (Revelation 12:7-9)

“And I saw a messenger coming down from the heaven, having the key to the pit of the deep and a great chain in his hand. And he seized the dragon, the serpent of old, who is the Devil and Satan, and bound him for a thousand years,” (Revelation 20:1-2)

Hasatan is still able to go to Heaven, as seen in the aforementioned verses and in Job 1:6, where he presented himself before Yah alongside the sons of Elohim. The significance here, is that contrary to popular belief, Satan has not been exiled from heaven doomed to never return, but still has the ability to walk in the Set-apart land of Yah’s domain.

“And the day came to be that the sons of Elohim came to present themselves before יהוה, and Satan also came among them.” (Job 1:6)

The fiery serpents mentioned in Numbers and Deuteronomy are also described as Saraph, which means serpent, fiery serpent, poisonous serpent (fiery from the burning effect of poison), seraph, seraphim, majestic beings with 6 wings, human hands or voices in attendance upon Elohim. It also refers to a class of angels. In Isaiah 6:6, one of the Seraphim is described as working in the slaughter-place of heaven. This raises the question of whether the fiery serpents mentioned earlier could be fallen Seraphim living in the wastelands, or if they were simply poisonous snakes.

“And one of the seraphim flew to me, having in his hand a live coal which he had taken with the tongs from the slaughter-place.” (Isaiah 6:6)

In 2 Corinthians 11:14, we read that Satan masquerades as a messenger of light, indicating that he still looks like a righteous messenger, despite his true nature. So his appearance is not one of red skin, horns and a forked tail, but one of majesty befitting a messenger of Elohim. This also might have played into the deception of Eve, as Hasatan would have looked like a proper emissary of Yah, but was working his whispers of deception. 

“And no wonder! For Satan himself masquerades as a messenger of light!” (2 Corinthians 11:14)

In Genesis 3:14, Yah curses the Nahash by making it crawl on its belly and eat dust all the days of its life. This punishment implies that Nahash was not a normal snake, as they already crawl on their bellies. 

“And יהוה Elohim said to the naḥash, “Because you have done this, you are cursed more than all livestock and more than every beast of the field. On your belly you are to go, and eat dust all the days of your life.” (Genesis 3:14)

In Genesis 3:15, we see that there is enmity between the Messiah and those of Hasatan, not biological snakes. This is confirmed in Matthew 13:37-39, where the good seed represents the sons of the reign, while the darnel represents the sons of the wicked one, and the enemy who sowed them is the devil. Furthermore, more in John 8:44, Yeshua states that the devil is the father of lies, meaning he is the first to lie. That first lie occurred between him and Eve.

“And I put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and her Seed. He shall crush your head, and you shall crush His heel.” (Genesis 3:15)

“And He answering, said to them, “He who is sowing the good seed is the Son of Aḏam, and the field is the world. And the good seed, these are the sons of the reign, but the darnel are the sons of the wicked one, and the enemy who sowed them is the devil. And the harvest is the end of the age, and the reapers are the messengers.” (Matthew 13:37-39)

“You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you wish to do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and has not stood in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks the lie, he speaks of his own, for he is a liar and the father of it.” (John 8:44)

To conclude this thought, while the Nahash is often translated as serpent, its root meaning suggests that it is associated with supernatural abilities and divination. The use of the same word to describe Leviathan, fiery serpents, and fallen Seraphim implies that Nahash may not be just an ordinary creature. Instead, it may represent a class of divine beings, such as Hasatan. Ultimately, the Nahash represents the spiritual battle between good and evil, between Yahweh and Hasatan.

The Prince of Tsor

“You were in Ěḏen, the garden of Elohim. Every precious stone was your covering: the ruby, topaz, and diamond, beryl, shoham, and jasper, sapphire, turquoise, and emerald and gold. The workmanship of your settings and mountings was prepared for you on the day you were created. “You were the anointed keruḇ that covered. And I placed you, you were on the set-apart mountain of Elohim. You walked up and down in the midst of stones of fire.” (Ezekiel 28:13-14)

The mention of the prince of Tsor in Ezekiel 28 has been a topic of debate for centuries. While some have claimed that this prince is a reference to Satan, the context of the chapter suggests otherwise. In fact, Ezekiel 28 makes it clear that the prince of Tsor is a man:

“Son of man, say to the prince of Tsor, ‘Thus said the Master יהוה, “Because your heart is lifted up, and you say, ‘I am Ěl, I sit in the seat of Elohim, in the heart of the seas,’ whereas you are a man, and not Ěl, though you set your heart as the heart of Elohim!” (Ezekiel 28:2)

In the book of Ezekiel, the prince of Tsor and other earthly kings are associated with Eden. However, this association is not meant to suggest that these kings are equivalent to Satan or other demonic entities, or were even in Eden. Instead, Yah through Ezekiel places foreign kings “in Eden” metaphorically to ridicule their self-perceived glory, highlighting the inadequacy of earthly rulers before El Shaddai.

For example, soon after speaking of Tyre’s king being “in Eden,” Ezekiel asks the king of Egypt, 

“To whom are you to be compared in esteem and greatness among the trees in Ěḏen? But you shall be brought down with the trees of Ěḏen to the depths of the earth, lie in the midst of the uncircumcised, with those slain by the sword. This is Pharaoh and all his crowd,’ declares the Master יהוה.” (Ezekiel 31:18) 

Of course, Pharaoh was never literally among the trees of Eden, nor were Eden’s trees ever recorded as being cut down.

Tyre, or Tsor, was a city in Lebanon that was part of the Canaanite empire, located on the coast of the Mediterranean Sea. It was a powerhouse in the commerce business, and its wealth and splendor were the subject of admiration and envy. 

The reference to the prince of Tsor as a "kerub" or "cherub" is also significant. This term is typically associated with angelic beings that serve as protectors, and the city of Tsor was known for its treasure and defensive capabilities. Through its richness in trade, it could supply the entire region with supplies. In a sense, Tsor could have acted as a caretaker of Israel if they had chosen to follow Yah. They do not, which will lead to their destruction, which is mentioned in Isaiah 23: 1-6, Ezekiel 26:1-8, and here in Ezekiel 28:16-17

“By the greatness of your trade you became filled with violence within, and you sinned. So I thrust you from the mountain of Elohim, and I destroyed you, O covering keruḇ, from the midst of the stones of fire.“Your heart was lifted up because of your loveliness, you corrupted your wisdom for the sake of your splendour. I threw you to the earth, I laid you before sovereigns, to look at you.” (Ezekiel 28:16-17)

 The stones of fire mentioned above could be alluding to the fact that the city of Tsor decorated its walls with gold shields imbued with precious stones, which would light up when reflecting sunlight, giving them and the city wall a fiery appearance. This prophecy came to pass when Nebuchadnezzar and Alexander the Great (at different times) both conquered and burnt the city of Tsor. Its splendor and wealth were laid desolate by invading Kings.

In conclusion, while the mention of the prince of Tsor in Ezekiel 28 has been the subject of much debate and interpretation over the years, the context of the chapter and the description of the prince suggest that he was a mortal ruler rather than a reference to Satan’s rebellion. 

Continue to test all things, including this article, and may the Ruach Hakodesh lead you into all truth.

P.S.

Check out some of my books! Available in both print and Kindle versions.