Are the Danes Descended from the Tribe of Dan?

 

The Danes and the Tribe of Dan: A Lost Connection?

One of the enduring mysteries of biblical history is the fate of the “lost ten tribes of Israel,” who were carried into exile by the Assyrian Empire in 722 BCE. The prophets declared that although Israel would be scattered, they would not be forgotten:

“Yet the number of the children of Yisra’ĕl shall be as the sand of the sea, which is not measured nor counted. And it shall be in the place where it was said to them, ‘You are not My people,’ they shall be called, ‘You are the sons of the living Ěl.’” (Hosea 1:10)

Among these tribes was Dan, whose name means “Judge” in Hebrew. The tribe was associated with justice, judgment, and the scales of law. One of its most famous members was Samson, the mighty deliverer of Israel. But Dan was also unique in another respect: it was a coastal tribe with a strong tradition of seafaring.

“Gil‛aḏ remained beyond the Yardĕn, and why did Dan remain on ships? Ashĕr continued at the seashore, and remained by its landing places.” (Judges 5:17)

This nautical characteristic may provide a key clue to the tribe’s later migrations.

Tribal Traits: The Serpent’s Trail

When Jacob blessed his sons, he spoke of Dan in unusual terms:

“Dan rightly rules his people as one of the tribes of Yisra’ĕl. Dan is a serpent by the way, an adder by the path, that bites the horse’s heels so that its rider falls backward. I have waited for your deliverance, O יהוה!” (Genesis 49:16–18)

Some interpreters see in this imagery the idea of Dan leaving a “trail” wherever they went, much like a serpent leaves its track in the dust. Indeed, throughout Scripture, we see Dan renaming conquered places after their forefather:

“They called the name of the city Dan, after the name of Dan their father, who was born to Yisra’ĕl.” (Judges 18:29; Joshua 19:47)

“They encamped in Qiryath Ye‛arim… therefore they call that place Maḥanĕh Ḏan to this day.” (Judges 18:12)

If this was their habit in the land of Israel, might they not have done the same wherever they traveled in exile? This may explain the curious prevalence of “Dan” in the names of major rivers in Europe: the Danube, Dniester, Dnieper, Don, and Donets.

Dan and the Sea Peoples

Being a seafaring tribe, Dan likely interacted with the Phoenicians, the great maritime traders of the ancient world. Archaeology shows that the Phoenicians ventured as far as the British Isles to obtain tin from Cornwall. Herodotus, the Greek historian, wrote:

“The Cassiterides, from which tin comes to us, lie in the sea beyond the Pillars of Heracles.” (Histories, 3.115)

If the Phoenicians knew the British Isles, could Dan have journeyed with them? Such voyages may explain the echoes of Dan found in Celtic and Scandinavian traditions.

 

The Tuatha Dé Danann

Irish legend tells of the Tuatha Dé Danann, a mysterious people who arrived in Ireland by sea. They brought treasures, advanced knowledge, and the role of law-givers to the early Irish. They were remembered as supernatural culture-bringers.

Some researchers propose that the Tuatha Dé Danann were in fact the Tribe of Dan remembered through myth. The name itself is telling: “Danann” may share the same root as Dan, suggesting “the people of Dan.”

Among their treasures was the Stone of Scone (or Stone of Destiny), later used in the coronation of Scottish and British monarchs. Some even claim it was Jacob’s pillow stone, upon which he dreamed of angels ascending and descending.

"And he came upon a place and stopped over for the night, for the sun had set. And he took one of the stones of that place and put it at his head, and he lay down in that place to sleep. And he dreamed and saw a ladder set up on the earth, and its top reached to the heavens, and saw messengers of Elohim going up and coming down on it." (Genesis 28:11-12)

 

Denmark: The Land of the Danes

The most direct link may be Denmark itself, whose name literally means “the borderland of the Danes.” According to tradition, it was named after a legendary King Dan. The resonance with the biblical tribe of Dan is hard to overlook.

If Dan left their mark on rivers, regions, and legends across Europe, could Denmark represent one of their final destinations?

Conclusion: Scattered Yet Not Lost

The Scriptures remind us that although the tribes were scattered, they would one day be remembered and restored. The possible connection between the Danes of northern Europe and the Tribe of Dan illustrates how prophecy, history, and folklore may intertwine.

Whether through rivers named Dan, Irish legends of the Tuatha Dé Danann, or the very name of Denmark, the serpent’s trail of Dan may still be winding through history — waiting for the day when all Israel is gathered once again.

P.S.

Check out some of my books! Available in both print and Kindle versions.

Speaking as One: The Prophetic Return to the Language of Yah

 

Have you ever wondered what language Yah speaks? Or what language the angels in heaven might use to communicate among themselves or with their Elohim? Some might suggest that El Shaddai speaks an unknown divine tongue or even all languages simultaneously. Certainly, He can understand and speak in any language, as can the angels if they choose. But this still leaves a fundamental question: what language did He use when He spoke creation into existence?

“And Elohim said, “Let light come to be,” and light came to be.” (Genesis 1:3)

 Contemplate this statement long enough, and you may find the answer — the only logical conclusion that emerges.

The Language of Creation

“And I opened his mouth, and his ears and his lips, and I began to speak with him in Hebrew in the tongue of the creation.” (Jubilees 12:26)

The original language — the language of creation and our Creator — is Hebrew. This divine tongue was passed down to Adam and Eve and remained the language of all nations until the time of the Tower of Babel.

“Yah said, “Behold, they are one people, and they all have one language, and this is what they begin to do. Now nothing will be withheld from them, which they intend to do. Come, let’s go down, and there confuse their language, that they may not understand one another’s speech.” (Genesis 11:6-7)

After the dispersion at the Tower of Babel, a multitude of languages emerged as people scattered across the world. Yet, Hebrew was preserved on earth, safeguarded through Abraham and passed down to his descendants, Isaac and Jacob.

“And Yah Elohim said: 'Open his mouth and his ears, that he may hear and speak with his mouth, with the language which has been revealed'; for it had ceased from the mouths of all the children of men from the day of the overthrow of Babel. And I opened his mouth, and his ears and his lips, and I began to speak with him in Hebrew in the tongue of the creation. And he took the books of his fathers, and these were written in Hebrew, and he transcribed them, and he began from henceforth to study them, and I made known to him that which he could not understand, and he studied them during the six rainy months.”  (Jubilees 12:25-27)  

The Return of a Pure Language

In the resurrection, we will speak Hebrew, just as was prophesied long ago. 

“And after these things shall Abraham and Isaac and Jacob arise unto life, and I and my brethren shall be chiefs of the tribes of Israel: Levi first, I the second, Joseph third, Benjamin fourth, Simeon fifth; Issachar sixth, and so all in order. And Yah blessed Levi, and the Angel of the Presence, me; the powers of glory, Simeon; the heaven, Reuben; the earth, Issachar; the sea, Zebulun; the mountains, Joseph; the tabernacle, Benjamin; the luminaries, Dan; Eden, Naphtali; the sun, Gad; the moon, Asher. And ye shall be the people of Yah, and have one tongue.” (Testament of Judah 25:1-3)

“For then I will restore to the peoples a pure language, That they all may call on the name of Yah, to serve Him with one accord.” (Zephaniah 3:9)

Conclusion

While this revelation may not surprise those well-versed in Scripture, it invites us to reflect on the beauty and power of the Hebrew language — the tongue of our forefathers, our Messiah, and the one true Elohim. Though we may not all speak Hebrew now, or speak it well, I have no doubt that when we enter the Kingdom, the Father will open our mouths and ears so that we may hear and speak together with one (echad) tongue.

P.S.

Check out some of my books! Available in both print and Kindle versions.

The Sign of Jonah: A Deeper Understanding

 

The story of Jonah and the whale is one of the most iconic narratives in the Bible, often shared with both children and adults. Many of us are acquainted with the account: Jonah, a prophet, disobeys Elohim's command to go to Nineveh, is swallowed by a giant fish, and spends three days and three nights in its belly before being vomited out alive. However, what if there’s more to this story? What if Jonah's time in the belly of the fish wasn’t spent alive, but rather, as a dead man? This perspective could bring new insight into the comparison Yeshua makes in Matthew 12:38-41, offering a profound connection between Jonah's experience and Yeshua's own death and resurrection.

The Sign of Jonah: Yeshua's Prophecy

“Then certain of the scribes and Pharisees answered, “Rabbi, we want to see a sign from you.” But he answered them, “An evil and adulterous generation seeks after a sign, but no sign will be given to it but the sign of Jonah the prophet. For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the huge fish, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. The men of Nineveh will stand up in the judgment with this generation and will condemn it, for they repented at the proclaiming of Jonah; and behold, someone greater than Jonah is here.” (Matthew 12:38-41)

When the scribes and Pharisees asked Yeshua for a sign to prove His divine authority, Yeshua responds by referring to "the sign of Jonah," stating, "For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the huge fish, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth." Yeshua's reference to the "heart of the earth" is widely understood as a reference to Sheol, the abode of the dead. This implies that, like Yeshua, Jonah may have experienced death during his time in the fish, only to be resurrected by Elohim.

Jonah's Journey: Death and Resurrection

The Book of Jonah provides clues that support the notion of Jonah’s death and subsequent resurrection. Jonah 1:17 tells us that Yah prepared a huge fish to swallow Jonah, and that Jonah was in the belly of the fish for three days and three nights.

“Yah prepared a huge fish to swallow up Jonah, and Jonah was in the belly of the fish three days and three nights.” (Jonah 1:17)

However, Jonah's prayer in chapter 2 offers a deeper insight into his experience. Jonah describes his descent into the depths, surrounded by water and seaweed, barred in by the earth, and finally, crying out from the "belly of Sheol." This language suggests that Jonah wasn't just alive and praying in the fish's belly but had actually died and was in Sheol, the realm of the dead.

“Then Jonah prayed to Yah, his Elohim, out of the fish’s belly. He said, “I called because of my affliction to Yah. He answered me. Out of the belly of Sheol I cried. You heard my voice. For you threw me into the depths, in the heart of the seas. The flood was all around me. All your waves and your billows passed over me. I said, ‘I have been banished from your sight; yet I will look again toward your holy temple.’ The waters surrounded me, even to the soul. The deep was around me. The weeds were wrapped around my head. I went down to the bottoms of the mountains. The earth barred me in forever; yet you have brought my life up from the pit, Yah my Elohim. “When my soul fainted within me, I remembered Yah. My prayer came in to you, into your holy temple. Those who regard vain idols forsake their own mercy. But I will sacrifice to you with the voice of thanksgiving. I will pay that which I have vowed. Salvation belongs to Yah.” Then Yah spoke to the fish, and it vomited out Jonah on the dry land.” (Jonah 2:1-10)

The prayer itself is written in past tense, indicating that Jonah’s cry from Sheol occurred after his death. Jonah describes being cast into the deep, his life ebbing away, and then being brought back to life by Yah. It is only after this resurrection that Jonah prays to Elohim, recognizing his deliverance from Sheol and offering thanksgiving. The time gap between Jonah 1:17 and the beginning of his prayer in Jonah 2:1 seems to correspond with the three days and nights Jonah spends in Sheol, paralleling Yeshua's own time in the grave.

The Sign of Jonah: A Prophetic Parallel

Understanding Jonah's ordeal as one of death and resurrection brings insightful depth to Yeshua’s words in Matthew 12. The parallels between Jonah and Yeshua become clear:

• Both Were Dead for Three Days and Nights: Jonah's experience in the fish and Yeshua’s time in the tomb both lasted for three days and nights.
• Both Went to Sheol: Jonah describes his soul crying out from Sheol, and Yeshua descended to the heart of the earth, often interpreted as His descent into Sheol.
• Both Had Their Bodies Preserved: Jonah’s body was preserved within the fish, while Yeshua’s body lay in the tomb.
• Both Were Resurrected: Jonah was brought back to life and vomited onto dry land, and Yeshua was resurrected from the dead.

Conclusion: Power Over Death

The story of Jonah is more than just a tale of disobedience and redemption; it is a foreshadowing of Yeshua’s own death and resurrection. By re-examining the details of Jonah’s experience, we gain a greater understanding of the sign that Yeshua pointed to—the sign of Jonah. This sign serves as a staunch reminder of the transformative power of resurrection, both for Jonah, who was brought back from Sheol, and for the whole House of Israel through Yeshua’s victory over death. The sign of Jonah is a testament to Elohim’s power to bring life from death, a theme that resonates through the ages and continues to offer hope to us all.

P.S.

Check out some of my books! Available in both print and Kindle versions. 

Unveiling the Reality Behind Mythological Deities: A Revelation of Ancient Truths

 

Across diverse cultures, tales of gods, monsters, and heroes have woven intricate narratives, collectively known as mythology. Often dismissed as mere folklore, these stories offer glimpses into realms beyond our comprehension. What if, however, these myths were not solely products of imagination? While I do not assert the existence of other gods as traditionally conceived, in this article, I propose an intriguing possibility: that the ancient gods of mythology are, in reality, the fallen angels as depicted in the ancient text of 1 Enoch.

The Fallen Ones

“It happened after the sons of men had multiplied in those days, that daughters were born to them, elegant and beautiful. And when the angels, the sons of heaven, beheld them, they became enamoured of them, saying to each other, Come, let us select for ourselves wives from the progeny of men, and let us beget children. Then their leader Samyaza said to them; I fear that you may perhaps be indisposed to the performance of this enterprise; And that I alone shall suffer for so grievous a crime. But they answered him and said; We all swear; And bind ourselves by mutual execrations, that we will not change our intention, but execute our projected undertaking. Then they swore all together, and all bound themselves by mutual execrations. Their whole number was two hundred, who descended upon Ardis, which is the top of Mount Armon. That mountain, therefore, was called Armon, because they had sworn upon it, and bound themselves by mutual execrations.” (1 Enoch 7:1-8)

Angels, being immortal and not requiring procreation for the perpetuation of their kind, do not need wives. This notion is even referenced by our Messiah.

“In the resurrection then, when they rise, whose wife shall she be? For seven had her as wife. And יהושע answering, said to them, “Is this not why you go astray, because you do not know the Scriptures nor the power of Elohim? “For when they rise from the dead, they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are as messengers in the heavens.” (Mark 12:23-25)

Notice also how Yeshua remarks that they do not comprehend the scriptures, yet the sole mention of angels in relation to marriage or sexual matters is found exclusively in the book of 1 Enoch. This serves as further indication of 1 Enoch's scriptural significance. Returning to the angels who abandoned their celestial abodes for mortal women, we observe a striking parallel with the deities of mythology. These entities seek to intermingle with humanity, driven often by base desires such as lust. This mirrors the account of the angels who prioritized progeny and physical relationships above all else.

The True Names of the Gods of Mythology

“These are the names of their chiefs: Samyaza, who was their leader, Urakabarameel, Akibeel, Tamiel, Ramuel, Danel, Azkeel, Saraknyal, Asael, Armers, Batraal, Anane, Zavebe, Samsaveel, Ertael, Turel, Yomyael, Arazyal. These were the prefects of the two hundred angels, and the remainder were all with them.” (1 Enoch 7:7-9)

After the dispersion of people from the Tower of Babel, each culture inevitably modified the names and attributes of the fallen angels who once held sway over their ancestors. Hence, every mythology features a deity associated with the sun or craftsmanship. These figures represent the same entities, albeit reshaped by linguistic confusion and the passage of time. As we shall explore, the dominion of the Fallen Ones came to an end with the Great Flood. Nonetheless, the memory of these formidable beings endured beyond the deluge, with their lineage persisting through lesser giants even after the cataclysmic event.

“But the angels transgressed this appointment, and were captivated by love of women, and begat children, who are those that are called demons, and besides, they afterwards subdued the human race to themselves, partly by magical writings, and partly by fears and the punishments they occasioned, and partly by teaching them to offer sacrifices, and incense and libations, of which things they stood in need after they were enslaved by lustful passions; and among men they sowed murders, wars, adulteries, intemperate deeds, and all wickedness. Whence also the poets and mythologists, not knowing that it was the angels and those demons who had been begotten by them that did these things to men, and women, and cities, and nations, which they related, ascribed them to God Himself [i.e. Jupiter), and to those who were accounted to be His very offspring, and to the offspring of those who were called His brothers, Neptune and Pluto, and to the children again of these their offspring. For whatever name each of the angels had given to himself and his children, by that name they called them.” (Writings of Justin Martyr and Athenagoras. Transl. Clark's AnteNic. Lib. Vol. ii., PP- 75, 76)

Knowledge

“Then they took wives, each choosing for himself; whom they began to approach, and with whom they cohabited; teaching them sorcery, incantations, and the dividing of roots and trees.” (1 Enoch 7:10)

“Moreover, Azazyel taught men to make swords, knives, shields, breastplates, the fabrication of mirrors, and the workmanship of bracelets and ornaments, the use of paint, the beautifying of the eyebrows, the use of stones of every valuable and select kind, and of all sorts of dyes, so that the world became altered. Impiety increased; fornication multiplied; and they transgressed and corrupted all their ways. Amazarak taught all the sorcerers, and dividers of roots: Armers taught the solution of sorcery; Barkayal taught the observers of the stars; Akibeel taught signs; Tamiel taught astronomy; And Asaradel taught the motion of the moon.” (1 Enoch 8:1-8)

The fallen angels imparted knowledge to our ancestors, much like the gods of mythology did with humans. It represents a parallel event, reshaped and recounted to suit the cultural context of the dispersed populations following the collapse of Babel.

Giants, the Offspring of Angels

“And the women conceiving brought forth giants…” (1 Enoch 7:11)

This verse is collaborated with Genesis and Flavius Josephus, a Jewish historian from the first century.

“And it came to be, when men began to increase on the face of the earth, and daughters were born to them, that the sons of Elohim saw the daughters of men, that they were good. And they took wives for themselves of all whom they chose. And יהוה said, “My Spirit shall not strive with man forever in his going astray. He is flesh, and his days shall be one hundred and twenty years.” The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of Elohim came in to the daughters of men and they bore children to them. Those were the mighty men who were of old, the men of name.” (Genesis 6:1-4)

“For many Angels of God accompanied with women, and begat sons that proved unjust, and despisers of all that was good; on account of the confidence, they had in their own strength. For the tradition is, that these men did what resembled the acts of those whom the Grecians call Giants.” (Flavius Josephus Chapter 3 Section 1.)

The union of angels and humans results in the creation of giants, a race characterized not only by physical stature but also by a formidable presence in the spiritual realm—an inheritance from their celestial progenitors. I will explore this phenomenon further in my upcoming article, but the key takeaway here is that giants emerged from such unions. This parallels the concept of demigods and giants, offspring of unions between gods and mortals in mythology. Likewise, the giants who once roamed the earth were depicted as equally—if not more—malicious than their mythical counterparts.

“…These devoured all the labor of men; until it became impossible to feed them; When they turned themselves against men, in order to devour them.” (1 Enoch 7:12-13)    

“And men, being destroyed, cried out; and their voice reached to heaven.” (1 Enoch 8:9)

It was a harrowing era to inhabit. Fallen angels wielded dominion with little regard for humanity, permitting their offspring, the giants, to prey upon the vulnerable without restraint. They provided no shelter, no guidance, and showed no inclination to intervene. Driven by their aspirations to ascend to godhood, these fallen beings reveled in their creative pursuits, basking in self-appointed divinity for a fleeting moment in time.

An Apocalyptic War

Mythologies often recount tales of an ancient conflict that shook the very fabric of creation. While the identities of the opposing factions may vary, the epic scale of the battle endures. In reality, this war did occur, but it wasn't a clash between gods or giants; rather, it was a conflict between righteous angels and their fallen counterparts, alongside their giant offspring.

“Say to him in my name; hide yourself! And reveal to him the end, which is coming, because the whole earth will be destroyed. A deluge is about to come on all the earth; and all that is in it will be destroyed.  And now teach him so that he may escape and his offspring may survive for the whole Earth.” And further Yah said to Raphael: “Bind Azazel by his hands and his feet and throw him into the darkness. And split open the desert, which is in Dudael, and throw him there. And throw on him jagged and sharp stones and cover him with darkness. And let him stay there forever. And cover his face so that he may not see the light. And so that, on the Great Day of Judgment, he may be hurled into the fire. And restore the Earth which the Angels have ruined. And announce the restoration of the Earth. For I shall restore the Earth so that not all the sons of men shall be destroyed because of the knowledge which the Watchers made known and taught to their sons. And the whole Earth has been ruined by the teaching of the works of Azazel; and against him write: ALL SIN.” And Yah said to Gabriel: “Proceed against the bastards, and the reprobates, and against the sons of the fornicators. And destroy the sons of the fornicators, and the sons of the Watchers, from amongst men. And send them out, and send them against one another, and let them destroy themselves in battle; for they will not have length of days…. And the Yah said to Michael: “Go, inform Semyaza, and the others with him, who have associated with the women to corrupt themselves with them in all their uncleanness. When all their sons kill each other, and when they see the destruction of their loved ones, bind them for seventy generations, under the hills of the earth, until the day of their judgment and of their consummation, until the judgment, which is for all eternity, is accomplished. And in those days, they will lead them to the Abyss of Fire; in torment, and in prison they will be shut up for all eternity.” (1 Enoch 10:2-13)

Before the deluge, a formidable conflict unfolded, one that water alone could not quell. Recognizing the gravity of the situation, El Shaddai dispatched his archangels—Raphael, Gabriel, and Michael—to combat the giants and bind the fallen ones in chains of darkness, awaiting the day of judgment. This act of imprisonment is also referenced in the book of Jude.

“And the messengers who did not keep their own principality, but left their own dwelling, He has kept in everlasting shackles under darkness for the judgment of the great day.” (Jude 1:6)

Conclusion

“At the same time, it is very evident that, in many of the legends, not only of the Greek, but of the Hindu and other mythologies, the Gentile nations have embodied their remembrances of events, the true record of which is found in the Mosaic Scriptures.” (Rev. John Fleming, A.B., The Fallen Angels and the Heroes of Mythology, pg.9)

The tales passed down through ancient mythologies are often dismissed as mere products of primitive imagination, a narrative subtly propagated to undermine the ingenuity of our forebears. Yet, a closer examination reveals a reality far removed from such patronizing assumptions. Our ancestors were not mere simpletons cowering at thunder; their accomplishments, evident in the monumental structures they erected and the extensive voyages they undertook without modern aids like GPS, attest to their sophistication. They inhabited a world beyond our comprehension—one ruled by fallen angels and where giants roamed, consuming the flesh of men. Let us offer praise to the Almighty, Yah, for sending his celestial host to liberate humanity from such oppression.

Continue to test all things, including this article, and may the Rauch Hakodesh lead you into all truth.

P.S.

Check out some of my books! Available in both print and Kindle versions.

Uncovering St. Patrick's True Identity: A Hebrew and Torah-Observant Man in Ireland

 

Once again, my studies have brought me to the British Isles (a geographical term which does not imply that Ireland belongs to Great Britain). My first foray into the Isles was documented in my article "Wales and the Lost Tribes of Israel," and as it happens, Maewyn, Patrick's birth name, has Welsh origins.

Now, my research has taken me to the Emerald Island, where I have discovered a recurring pattern throughout history: the manipulation of a person's true identity to fit a specific narrative. This phenomenon occurred with Yeshua and Paul and how they are presented in the Christian Church.

In this case, I am delving into the records to uncover the true person behind St. Patrick. Contrary to popular belief, the celebrated saint was not Catholic but was, in fact, born a Hebrew. His family likely settled in the British Isles following the siege of Jerusalem. 

“The learned declare that he was of the Jews by origin, since it is manifest from the miracles which God wrought for him, that he was of the children of Israel, for of them were the Jews besides. For when the vengeance was inflicted by Titus and Vespasian, the Jews were scattered throughout the world, and Patrick’s original kindred came to Britain…” (Lives of Saints from the Book of Lismore. United States, AMS Press, 1890. pg. 150)

“Patrick may have been descended from the Sons of Israel. When the Sons of Israel were banished by Titus and Vespasian into slavery to the four corners of the world in revenge for the blood of Christ, his ancestors came to Britain.” (Book Of Leinster, 1160.)

“The links must account for the Hebrew quality of Irish monasticism, for modern Jewish authorities affirm that the remaining remnants of the Samaritan sect represent the purest form of the ancient Hebrew stock. The Samaritans were part of the northern tribes of Israel and their capital, Shechem was destroyed by Vespasian in 70 A.D. Since St. Patrick is said to be the descendant of an Israelite family who were scattered by Vespasian and Titus “in bondage throughout the four quarters of the world” and who came to Britain, it is possible that Patrick himself was of Samaritan ancestry.” (Boswell, Winthrop Palmer. The Roots of Irish Monasticism. United States, San Francisco State College., 1969. pg. 64-65)

Before moving on, there are three important points to note from the quotes mentioned. Firstly, it is worth considering why some Jews who fled Judea ended up in the British Isles. It is unlikely that they simply closed their eyes and pointed to a spot on the map. In my previous article, "Wales and the Lost Tribes of Israel," I argued that some of the northern tribes, specifically the House of Israel, may have found their way to the British Isles after being divorced and kicked out of their land.

Secondly, in the Book of Leinster, it is suggested that the Jewish people were exiled from Israel for killing Yeshua. While true in a sense, it was Rome that had killed Yeshua, and it's also important to remember that thousands of Jewish people were among his followers, and he himself was Jewish, as were his disciples. The writer of the Book of Leinster seems to be pushing a narrative that suggests the Jews (specifically, those of the House of Judah) are completely against the Messiah.

Thirdly, in "The Roots of Irish Monasticism," the author suggests that Maewyn may have been from Samaria, a region whose inhabitants are said to be descendants of the northern tribes that were not exiled from Israel after Assyria's conquest. This would make Maewyn a Hebrew by blood but not a Jew. For more information, please refer to my article "Israel and Judah".

Ireland and the Torah

Continuing with The Roots of Irish Monasticism, the author goes on to say,  

“Israelitish features in Irish monasticism include the use of an Eastern type liturgy visible in the Antiphonary if Bangor, the festal observance of Saturday in the same manner as the Jews, evidence for a Pharisaic observance of Sunday, the prominence of Hebrew features in Irish canon law collections (including Biblical Cities of Refuge and Jubilee Years), together with Mosaic prohibitions on diet, and injunctions on tithes likewise Hebraic in inspiration. There was also a Hebrew treatment of the sanctuary as already noted in the case of St. Columbanus, and finally there were numerous Hebrew words occurring in cryptographic monastic Irish works such as Hisperica Famina.” (Boswell, Winthrop Palmer. The Roots of Irish Monasticism. United States, San Francisco State College., 1969. pg. 64-65)

Historians have pointed out the similarities between the Celtic/Gaelic and Hebrew languages over the years. In Acts chapter 29, we find a possible explanation for this phenomenon. It is suggested that the Celts, to some degree, retained their ancient ways of keeping Torah.

Maewyn is credited with bringing the truth of Yeshua and Torah to Ireland. However, this was only after he had spent six years there as a slave. After regaining his freedom, he returned to Ireland and shared the powerful and life-changing message of Elohim. This is why there are so many references to Ireland and the Celts in general doing things in a Hebrew manner. 

“The Celts used a Latin Bible unlike the Vulgate, and kept Saturday as a day of rest, with special religious services on Sunday.” The Rise of the Mediaeval Church and Its Influence on the Civilization of Western Europe from the First to the Thirteenth Century. United States, B. Franklin, Flick, Alexander Clarence. 1909. pg. 237)

“It seems to have been customary in the Celtic churches of early times, in Ireland as well as Scotland, to keep Saturday, the Jewish Sabbath, as a day of rest from labor, and Sunday, commemorative of the Lord’s resurrection, as one of rejoicing, with exercises of public worship. In that case they obeyed the fourth commandment literally upon the seventh day of the week—the day on which the Lord lay in the grave—and did not understand the precept about resting from labor to apply to the day of rejoicing over his resurrection.” The Church in Scotland: A History of Its Antecedents, it Conflicts, and Its Advocates, from the Earliest Recorded Times to the First Assembly of the Reformed Church. United States, Presbyterian Board of Education, Moffat, James Clement. 1882. pg.140)

To correct a common misconception, the Sabbath is not Jewish; it belongs to Yah. However, it is not surprising that many historians and academics refer to anything Hebrew as Jewish, even in the case of Abraham, who was born before the existence of the tribe of Judah.

“A central feature [of the Celtic churches] was the profound respect for the authority of the Scripture, and a strong emphasis on the legal aspects of the Old Testament. The Liber ex Lege Moisi survives in four manuscripts of Irish origin, dating from c. 800 (Hardinge 1972, 50). It consists of a series of texts of Old Testament law, covering a variety of topics and situations. The work expresses an unstated assumption that Old Testament law was a prime directive for the proper conduct of everyday life. Hardinge cites a series of parallels between Celtic Christian practices and those of the Old Testament, in which the Celtic is a much closer variant of the original than anything surviving in the other branches of Christianity. The shared elements include the keeping of the Saturday Sabbath, tithing, the definition of “first fruits” and offerings, the establishment of walled precincts for the priestly/monastic families, inheritance of religious office, and fasting and dietary restrictions.” (St Joseph in Britain: Reconsidering the Legends. Part 2. Deborah K. E. Crawford. Folklore, vol. 105, 1994, pp. 51–59. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/1260629)

Maewyn and his disciple Columba were known for teaching the entire Bible, not just the small portion found at the back of the book. This stands in stark contrast to how Christianity is often taught by modern preachers and teachers. 

“Following the example Patrick, Columba and Celtic Christians for centuries made the Scriptures the foundation for their studies.” (The Celtic Church in Britain. Hardinge. pg. 30)

“…Columba was likewise credited with teaching “the books of the Law completely…” (The Celtic Church in Britain. Hardinge. pg. 50)

“…the Celtic Church began when Sabbath observance had not been relinquished by Christians at large…These traditions persisted for more than two centuries after the saint’s death.” (The Celtic Church in Britain. United Kingdom, S.P.C.K. for the Church Historical Society, Hardinge, Leslie. 1972. pg. 78)

If the historical Maeywn was a Torah-keeping follower of Yeshua, then how did Saint Patrick come about? Unfortunately, it is difficult for a person to defend themselves or speak out against false accusations once they have passed away. 

“Two centuries elapsed after Patrick’s death before any writer attempted to connect Patrick’s work with a papal commission. No pope ever mentioned him, neither is there anything in the ecclesiastical records of Rome concerning him.” (Truth Triumphant: The Church in the Wilderness. United States, Hartland Publications, Wilkinson, Benjamin George. 2004. pg. 81)

The Roman Church, or Christianity, waited until Maewyn, his disciple Columba, and all those who knew him had passed away before they began to rewrite history to fit their own narrative. Regrettably, this practice has been applied to many figures throughout history, including one who is now relegated to the realm of fantasy. 

Rome vs the Torah

When Constantine made Christianity the main religion of Rome, his intention was not to follow Yah as Yeshua did, but to use his own means. He merged pagan practices and festivals with Christian beliefs, such as Christmas, Easter, Halloween, and Valentine's Day.

I believe that Satan is actively working to manipulate the Roman-rooted church and erase the true history of those who followed Yeshua. This includes renaming certain groups and altering the characteristics of individuals such as Maewyn, erasing the parts of him that made him who he was.

The British Isles, perhaps because of their distance from Rome, did not immediately submit to the religious mandate. It would take centuries for Roman missionaries and monks to finally convert the Isles. However, these church officials had much to say about the region. 

“The Britains are against the entire world. They are hostile toward the Roman customs, not only in the Mass, but also on their tonsure, serving with the Jews in the shadow rather than the truth.” (St. Joseph In Britain: Reconsidering The Legends, Part 2 as originally published in Folklore Vol. 105, 1994)

“If one flouts the Council of Nicaea and keeps Easter with the Jews on the fourteenth of the moon, he shall be driven out of every church unless he does penance before his death.” (Medieval Handbooks of Penance: A Translation of the Principal "libri Poenitentiales" and Selections from Related Documents. United States, Columbia University Press, McNeill, John Thomas, and Gamer, Helena Margaret. 1938. pg. 188)

Maewyn’s Supposed Confessio

This letter has been attributed to Maewyn himself, but upon closer examination and taking a holistic approach to analyzing the document, it can only be concluded that this letter was not written by Maewyn and was most likely used by the Catholic Church to push their agenda. The Church wanted to turn him into a Catholic saint and used the letter to show that he had no issue with eating pork, a well-known method used by the Inquisition in identifying Jews. In the letter, Saint Patrick details being on a long journey with a group of companions who were on the brink of starvation when their prayers were answered by a herd of pigs. 

“And with God's help this came to pass; and behold, a herd of swine appeared on the road before our eyes, and they slew many of them, and remained there for two nights, and the were full of their meat and well restored, for many of them had fainted and would otherwise have been left half dead by the wayside.” (Confessio, attributed to Saint Patrick of Ireland.)

Now that we have gathered evidence showing that the Celtic people, including Maewyn, were Torah observant to some degree, we can see how this is problematic. Moreover, the church of Ireland, which Maewyn is credited with founding, followed many of the Torah's teachings, including the dietary instructions. 

“The rules of the Old Testament which shaped the theocracy of Israel were followed by the Celts as a natural consequence of their view of biblical authority. The role of the Liber ex Lege Moisi was paramount. The laws defining clean and unclean animals which might or might not be used as food, the methods of slaughtering animals, the advice on hygiene applying to both men and women, the Levirite marriage, the precepts modifying usury and slavery, the treatment of widows and orphans, as well as the payment of tithes and the offerings of first fruits, all were thought necessary.” (The Celtic Church in Britain. Hardinge. pg. 202)

Conclusion

Maewyn Succat was a man whose true attributes have been forgotten by many. His morals have been erased and reformatted to fit an agenda. Rather than being recognized as someone who brought the Torah and the message of Yeshua to Ireland, he is falsely remembered as the one who brought Catholicism to the Celts, his memory reduced to nothing more than a drinking holiday celebrated with green beer.

I hope you have enjoyed this little journey, and I beseech each one of you to do your own research on the matter. May the Ruach Hakodesh lead you into all truth.

P.S.

Check out some of my books! Available in both print and Kindle versions. 

Was the Serpent Really Satan? Unpacking the Biblical Evidence

“And the naḥash was more crafty than all the lives of the field which יהוה Elohim had made, and he said to the woman, “Is it true that Elohim has said, ‘Do not eat of every tree of the garden’?” (Genesis 3:1)

In Genesis 3:1, we read about the Nahash, who was craftier than all the creatures of the field created by Elohim. He is also known as the serpent who deceived Eve into eating from the Tree of Knowledge. But was the Nahash just a mere snake or something else entirely?

The Hebrew word used for Nahash can be translated as serpent, snake, image (of serpent), or fleeing serpent (mythological/ or perhaps more than myth). In Numbers 21:6 and Deuteronomy 8:15, we see the same word translated as fiery serpents, which were sent by Yahweh to punish the Israelites for their rebellion.

“And יהוה sent fiery serpents among the people, and they bit the people. And many of the people of Yisra’ĕl died.” (Numbers 21:6)

“Who led you through that great and awesome wilderness – fiery serpents and scorpions and thirst – where there was no water, who brought water for you out of the flinty rock, (Deuteronomy 8:15)

In Isaiah 27:1, Nahash is also used to describe Leviathan, a creature far superior in terms of size and ability to the average snake. Here, Leviathan is referred to as a fleeing serpent (nahash).

“In that day יהוה with His severe sword, great and strong, punishes Liwiathan the fleeing serpent, Liwiathan that twisted serpent. And He shall kill the monster that is in the sea.” (Isaiah 27:1)

Interestingly, the root word for Nahash, nâchash, naw-khash', means to practice divination, observe signs, learn by experience, practice fortunetelling, whisper a spell, or take as an omen. It implies that Nahash is associated with supernatural abilities and may not be just an ordinary creature.

In 1 Samuel 15:23, rebellion is compared to the sin of divination, which is rooted in Nahash, which also means serpent. This suggests that Nahash has a deeper spiritual connotation beyond its physical meaning.

“For rebellion is as the sin of divination, and stubbornness is as wickedness and idolatry. Because you have rejected the word of יהוה, He also does reject you as sovereign.” (1 Samuel 15:23)

In the book of Revelation, Satan is referred to as the dragon, the serpent of old, who deceived or enchanted Eve in the Garden of Eden. This means that Nahash, the serpent who deceived Eve, was Satan in disguise. 

“And there came to be fighting in the heaven: Miḵa’ĕl and his messengers fought against the dragon. And the dragon and his messengers fought, but they were not strong enough, nor was a place found for them in the heaven any longer. And the great dragon was thrown out, that serpent of old, called the Devil and Satan, who leads all the world astray. He was thrown to the earth, and his messengers were thrown out with him.” (Revelation 12:7-9)

“And I saw a messenger coming down from the heaven, having the key to the pit of the deep and a great chain in his hand. And he seized the dragon, the serpent of old, who is the Devil and Satan, and bound him for a thousand years,” (Revelation 20:1-2)

Hasatan is still able to go to Heaven, as seen in the aforementioned verses and in Job 1:6, where he presented himself before Yah alongside the sons of Elohim. The significance here, is that contrary to popular belief, Satan has not been exiled from heaven doomed to never return, but still has the ability to walk in the Set-apart land of Yah’s domain.

“And the day came to be that the sons of Elohim came to present themselves before יהוה, and Satan also came among them.” (Job 1:6)

The fiery serpents mentioned in Numbers and Deuteronomy are also described as Saraph, which means serpent, fiery serpent, poisonous serpent (fiery from the burning effect of poison), seraph, seraphim, majestic beings with 6 wings, human hands or voices in attendance upon Elohim. It also refers to a class of angels. In Isaiah 6:6, one of the Seraphim is described as working in the slaughter-place of heaven. This raises the question of whether the fiery serpents mentioned earlier could be fallen Seraphim living in the wastelands, or if they were simply poisonous snakes.

“And one of the seraphim flew to me, having in his hand a live coal which he had taken with the tongs from the slaughter-place.” (Isaiah 6:6)

In 2 Corinthians 11:14, we read that Satan masquerades as a messenger of light, indicating that he still looks like a righteous messenger, despite his true nature. So his appearance is not one of red skin, horns and a forked tail, but one of majesty befitting a messenger of Elohim. This also might have played into the deception of Eve, as Hasatan would have looked like a proper emissary of Yah, but was working his whispers of deception. 

“And no wonder! For Satan himself masquerades as a messenger of light!” (2 Corinthians 11:14)

In Genesis 3:14, Yah curses the Nahash by making it crawl on its belly and eat dust all the days of its life. This punishment implies that Nahash was not a normal snake, as they already crawl on their bellies. 

“And יהוה Elohim said to the naḥash, “Because you have done this, you are cursed more than all livestock and more than every beast of the field. On your belly you are to go, and eat dust all the days of your life.” (Genesis 3:14)

In Genesis 3:15, we see that there is enmity between the Messiah and those of Hasatan, not biological snakes. This is confirmed in Matthew 13:37-39, where the good seed represents the sons of the reign, while the darnel represents the sons of the wicked one, and the enemy who sowed them is the devil. Furthermore, more in John 8:44, Yeshua states that the devil is the father of lies, meaning he is the first to lie. That first lie occurred between him and Eve.

“And I put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and her Seed. He shall crush your head, and you shall crush His heel.” (Genesis 3:15)

“And He answering, said to them, “He who is sowing the good seed is the Son of Aḏam, and the field is the world. And the good seed, these are the sons of the reign, but the darnel are the sons of the wicked one, and the enemy who sowed them is the devil. And the harvest is the end of the age, and the reapers are the messengers.” (Matthew 13:37-39)

“You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you wish to do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and has not stood in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks the lie, he speaks of his own, for he is a liar and the father of it.” (John 8:44)

To conclude this thought, while the Nahash is often translated as serpent, its root meaning suggests that it is associated with supernatural abilities and divination. The use of the same word to describe Leviathan, fiery serpents, and fallen Seraphim implies that Nahash may not be just an ordinary creature. Instead, it may represent a class of divine beings, such as Hasatan. Ultimately, the Nahash represents the spiritual battle between good and evil, between Yahweh and Hasatan.

The Prince of Tsor

“You were in Ěḏen, the garden of Elohim. Every precious stone was your covering: the ruby, topaz, and diamond, beryl, shoham, and jasper, sapphire, turquoise, and emerald and gold. The workmanship of your settings and mountings was prepared for you on the day you were created. “You were the anointed keruḇ that covered. And I placed you, you were on the set-apart mountain of Elohim. You walked up and down in the midst of stones of fire.” (Ezekiel 28:13-14)

The mention of the prince of Tsor in Ezekiel 28 has been a topic of debate for centuries. While some have claimed that this prince is a reference to Satan, the context of the chapter suggests otherwise. In fact, Ezekiel 28 makes it clear that the prince of Tsor is a man:

“Son of man, say to the prince of Tsor, ‘Thus said the Master יהוה, “Because your heart is lifted up, and you say, ‘I am Ěl, I sit in the seat of Elohim, in the heart of the seas,’ whereas you are a man, and not Ěl, though you set your heart as the heart of Elohim!” (Ezekiel 28:2)

In the book of Ezekiel, the prince of Tsor and other earthly kings are associated with Eden. However, this association is not meant to suggest that these kings are equivalent to Satan or other demonic entities, or were even in Eden. Instead, Yah through Ezekiel places foreign kings “in Eden” metaphorically to ridicule their self-perceived glory, highlighting the inadequacy of earthly rulers before El Shaddai.

For example, soon after speaking of Tyre’s king being “in Eden,” Ezekiel asks the king of Egypt, 

“To whom are you to be compared in esteem and greatness among the trees in Ěḏen? But you shall be brought down with the trees of Ěḏen to the depths of the earth, lie in the midst of the uncircumcised, with those slain by the sword. This is Pharaoh and all his crowd,’ declares the Master יהוה.” (Ezekiel 31:18) 

Of course, Pharaoh was never literally among the trees of Eden, nor were Eden’s trees ever recorded as being cut down.

Tyre, or Tsor, was a city in Lebanon that was part of the Canaanite empire, located on the coast of the Mediterranean Sea. It was a powerhouse in the commerce business, and its wealth and splendor were the subject of admiration and envy. 

The reference to the prince of Tsor as a "kerub" or "cherub" is also significant. This term is typically associated with angelic beings that serve as protectors, and the city of Tsor was known for its treasure and defensive capabilities. Through its richness in trade, it could supply the entire region with supplies. In a sense, Tsor could have acted as a caretaker of Israel if they had chosen to follow Yah. They do not, which will lead to their destruction, which is mentioned in Isaiah 23: 1-6, Ezekiel 26:1-8, and here in Ezekiel 28:16-17

“By the greatness of your trade you became filled with violence within, and you sinned. So I thrust you from the mountain of Elohim, and I destroyed you, O covering keruḇ, from the midst of the stones of fire.“Your heart was lifted up because of your loveliness, you corrupted your wisdom for the sake of your splendour. I threw you to the earth, I laid you before sovereigns, to look at you.” (Ezekiel 28:16-17)

 The stones of fire mentioned above could be alluding to the fact that the city of Tsor decorated its walls with gold shields imbued with precious stones, which would light up when reflecting sunlight, giving them and the city wall a fiery appearance. This prophecy came to pass when Nebuchadnezzar and Alexander the Great (at different times) both conquered and burnt the city of Tsor. Its splendor and wealth were laid desolate by invading Kings.

In conclusion, while the mention of the prince of Tsor in Ezekiel 28 has been the subject of much debate and interpretation over the years, the context of the chapter and the description of the prince suggest that he was a mortal ruler rather than a reference to Satan’s rebellion. 

Continue to test all things, including this article, and may the Ruach Hakodesh lead you into all truth.

P.S.

Check out some of my books! Available in both print and Kindle versions.

Who is Elohim's Chosen Nation? A Biblical Perspective

 

There is a sentiment within America that Elohim has chosen this nation for greatness. This is not a new idea either, remember Manifest Destiny? Yet, it goes beyond being blessed (as some might say), to many, America is Elohim’s country. A city on a shining hill that is broadcasting the light of democracy to the heathen world. As I typed that sentence, generations of propaganda flooded my mind; indeed, the spirit of nationalism has been intertwined in American Churches since the birth of the nation. 

While I could delve into the history of religion in America, and perhaps one day I will, the purpose of this article is to find out who is Elohim’s chosen? Is it America with its capital decorated with pagan gods and objects? Is it the political state of Israel that does not even keep Torah? Or is it a nation of people, not defined as our modern understanding of nations, but as a group of people united in their belief? Using Biblical sources, we will see that the scriptures make it quite clear who is chosen.

Elohim’s Inheritance

 “Blessed is the nation whose Elohim is יהוה, The people whom He has chosen as His own inheritance.” (Psalms 33:12)

I saw this verse plastered on an American flag with an eagle flapping its wings. It perfectly encapsulates how Americans view themselves within the scope of the Bible. In time, I will cover what god, America, truly serves, but for now, let’s break down this verse and see what David was actually saying. As far as the first half of the verse goes, the issue is that people read it in a vacuum. Not understanding how grafting in works, nor their identity in the Messiah. I will touch on it lightly here, but for greater study, please visit “Grafted In” and “Israel and Judah”. To put it shortly, when someone accepts Yeshua as their Messiah and agrees to keep Elohim’s Commands, they are no longer gentiles but fellow Hebrews/ Israelites in Yah’s kingdom. Think about the Egyptians who left with the Israelites following the death of the firstborn. 

“And the children of Yisra’ĕl(Israel) set out from Ra‛meses(Ramses) to Sukkoth, about six hundred thousand men on foot, besides the little ones. And a mixed multitude went up with them too, also flocks and herds, very much livestock.” (Exodus 12:37-38)

Yet by the time we reach Mount Sinai, there is no more talk of a mixed multitude. Why? Because the Egyptians who left with them crossed over (The meaning of Hebrew) and became assimilated into the tribes of Israel.

“And Mosheh went up to Elohim, and יהוה called to him from the mountain, saying, “This is what you are to say to the house of Ya‛aqoḇ(Jacob), and declare to the children of Yisra’ĕl(Israel): ‘You have seen what I did to the Mitsrites(Egyptians), and how I bore you on eagles’ wings and brought you to Myself. ‘And now, if you diligently obey My voice, and shall guard My covenant, then you shall be My treasured possession above all the peoples – for all the earth is Mine – ‘and you shall be to Me a reign of priests and a set-apart nation.’ Those are the words which you are to speak to the children of Yisra’ĕl(Israel).” (Exodus 19:3-6)

To which all the people present answered.

“And all the people answered together and said, “All that יהוה has spoken we shall do.” So Mosheh brought back the words of the people to יהוה.” (Exodus 19:8)

Those who were born Egyptian wouldn’t say that Egypt is a nation whose Elohim is Yah, just because a few crossed over. Instead, those naturally born Egyptians now identified as Israelites, much like Ruth and Rahab did. And what nation has Yah as their Elohim? Biblical Israel, a group of people who have submitted to the authority of El Shaddai, and now follow Yeshua in Torah obedience. 

What about the last part of the verse, who is Elohim’s inheritance?

“For the portion of יהוה is His people, Ya‛aqoḇ(Jacob) His allotted inheritance.” (Deuteronomy 32:9)

“Then I shall gather all nations, and bring them down to the Valley of Yehoshaphat. And I shall enter into judgment with them there for My people, My inheritance Yisra’ĕl(Israel), whom they have scattered among the nations, and they have divided up My land.” (Yoel 3:2)

America is not Elohim’s inheritance; the whole house of Israel is. It does not matter how many Hebrews live in America; it does not change Elohim’s inheritance. At one time, many Hebrews lived under Roman rule, but that didn’t make Rome Elohim’s inheritance. The individual Hebrews living in Rome or America are His inheritance, but not the nations they have been scattered to.  

Is it the Political State of Israel?

What’s the difference between the political state of Israel and Biblical Israel? One could argue everything, and that they are the same in name alone. The current state of Israel does not follow the Torah, but the Talmud, and neither do they accept Yeshua as their Messiah King. While it is true that Hebrews are living in Israel who are following after the Messiah in Torah obedience, the overwhelming majority do not. 

The biggest illustration of this Israel not being the Biblical Israel comes from prophecy. Many like to say that when the State of Israel was created in 1948, it was a fulfillment of prophecy; however, this cannot be the case.

“And you, son of man, take a stick for yourself and write on it, ‘For Yehuḏah(Judah) and for the children of Yisra’ĕl(Israel), his companions.’ Then take another stick and write on it, ‘For Yosĕph(Jospeh), the stick of Ephrayim(Ephraim), and for all the house of Yisra’ĕl(Israel), his companions.’ “Then bring them together for yourself into one stick, and they shall become one in your hand. “And when the children of your people speak to you, saying, ‘Won’t you show us what you mean by these?” (Ezekiel 37:16-18)

“And speak to them, ‘Thus said the Master יהוה, “See, I am taking the children of Yisra’ĕl(Israel) from among the nations, wherever they have gone, and shall gather them from all around, and I shall bring them into their land. “And I shall make them one nation in the land, on the mountains of Yisra’ĕl(Israel). And one sovereign shall be sovereign over them all, and let them no longer be two nations, and let them no longer be divided into two reigns.” (Ezekiel 37:21-22)

“And I shall make a covenant of peace with them – an everlasting covenant it is with them. And I shall place them and increase them, and shall place My set-apart place in their midst, forever.” (Ezekiel 37:26)

Yah said he would bring back both the House of Israel and the House of Judah, but only Judah returned. The whole House of Israel is still split and has not been unified yet. As for peace? Anything but peace has followed the State of Israel since its creation. Elohim has not set His set-apart place in their midst, and furthermore, He said He would bring them back, not the United Nations or the Rothschilds.  

The land of Israel has been taken once again, only this time the enemy claims to be the true inheritors of the land. Yet this is all going according to Yah’s plan, as the State of Israel, aka Babylon, is storing up wrath for itself.

“And in her was found the blood of prophets and set-apart ones, and of all who were slain on the earth.” (Revelations 18:24)

“Yerushalayim(Jerusalem), Yerushalayim(Jerusalem), killing the prophets and stoning those who are sent to her! How often I wished to gather your children together, the way a hen gathers her chickens under her wings, but you would not! See! Your house is left to you laid waste.” (Matthew 23: 37-38)

“And the great city became divided into three parts, and the cities of the nations fell. And great Baḇel was remembered before Elohim, to give her the cup of the wine of the fierceness of His wrath.” (Revelations 16:19)

“And their dead bodies lie in the street of the great city which spiritually is called Seḏom(Sodom) and Mitsrayim(Egypt), where also our Master was impaled.” (Revelations 11:8) 

 I could go on, but this truly is a topic worthy of having its own article. Hopefully, what I have presented is at least enough to get you to consider that the Political State of Israel is really Babylon masquerading as the true Israel.

So, who is Elohim’s chosen? Israel. And who makes up Israel? Those who have the testimony of Yeshua and keep the commands of Elohim.

“And he carried me away in the Spirit to a great and high mountain, and showed me the great city, the set-apart Yerushalayim(Jerusalem), descending out of the heaven from Elohim, having the esteem of Elohim, and her light was like a most precious stone, like a jasper stone, clear as crystal, and having a great and high wall, having twelve gates, and at the gates twelve messengers, and names written on them, which are those of the twelve tribes of the children of Yisra’ĕl(Israel).” (Revelation 21:10-12)

“In the middle of its street, and on either side of the river, was the tree of life, which bore twelve fruits, each tree yielding its fruit every month. And the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations.” Revelations 22:2)

“Blessed are those doing His commands, so that the authority shall be theirs unto the tree of life, and to enter through the gates into the city.” (Revelation 22:14)

There is no thirteenth gate for Gentiles, and no other nation of people has Elohim chosen except for Israel. All may come and be admitted into His kingdom, and His decree is Torah. Continue to test all things, and may the Ruach Hakodesh lead you into all truth. 

P.S.

Check out some of my books! Available in both print and Kindle versions. 

What was Joseph saying in Genesis 44:15 about Divination?

 

“And Yosĕph (Joseph) said to them, “What deed is this you have done? Did you not know that a man like me indeed divines?” (Genesis 44:15)

Did Joseph really practice divination, or is something else going on here? If one was to take this verse in isolation, then it would appear that Joseph admitted to using magic. The Bible, however, teaches that the use of divination is a sin.

“Let no one be found among you who makes his son or his daughter pass through the fire, or one who practices divination, or a user of magic, or one who interprets omens or a sorcerer,” (Deuteronomy 18:10)

 ‘Do not eat meat with the blood. Do not practice divination or magic.” (Leviticus 19:26)

Joseph was a righteous man that Yah blessed, so it would not make sense for him to be committing the sin of divination.

“And it came to be that יהוה was with Yosĕph (Joesph), and he became a prosperous man, and was in the house of his master the Mitsrian (Egyptian).” (Genesis 39:2)

“The prison warden did not look into any point that was under Yosĕph’s (Joseph’s) hand, because יהוה was with him. And whatever he did, יהוה made it prosper.” (Genesis 39:23)

And for those of you familiar with Joseph, know that he was made second in all of Egypt, and because of his position, he was able to save his family (along with Egypt) from the seven years of famine. While Joseph most certainly endured trials and tribulations, it would be disingenuous to assert that he was not blessed by El Shaddi. This being the case, then what was Joseph saying in Genesis 44:15? We actually have a few different manuscripts that detail what Joseph is doing. 

The Context of Genesis 44:15

Joseph, aforementioned, is second only to Pharaoh in Egypt, and when his brothers come to Egypt seeking food, it just so happens that Joseph is in charge of the food supply and distribution. His brothers do not recognize him, but Joseph knows exactly who they are. In order to test their hearts, Joseph comes up with several stratagems to put his brothers through. One of them, and this being connected to the verse in question, is to place a silver cup in the grain sack of Benjamin, to make it appear as though he had stolen it. Ultimately, this ruse shows Joseph that his brothers deeply regret what they did to Joseph as a child and how their actions caused much pain and sorrow for their father Jacob. 

The Bible’s Account

“And he commanded the one over his house, saying, “Fill the men’s sacks with food, as they are able to bear, and put each man’s silver in the mouth of his sack. And put my cup, the silver cup, in the mouth of the sack of the youngest, and the silver for his grain. And he did according to the word of Yosĕph which he spoke.” (Genesis 44:1-2)

Jubilees’ Account

“And Joseph devised a plan whereby he might learn their thoughts as to whether thoughts of peace prevailed amongst them, and he said to the steward who was over his house: 'Fill all their sacks with food, and return their money unto them into their vessels, and my cup, the silver cup out of which I drink, put it in the sack of the youngest, and send them away.” (Jubilees 42:25)

Jasher’s Account

“And when Joseph saw his brother, the son of his mother, he again wished to weep, and he entered the chamber, and he wept there, and he washed his face, and went out and refrained from weeping, and he said, Prepare food. And Joseph had a cup from which he drank, and it was of silver beautifully inlaid with onyx stones and bdellium, and Joseph struck the cup in the sight of his brethren whilst they were sitting to eat with him. And Joseph said unto the men, I know by this cup that Reuben the first born, Simeon and Levi and Judah, Issachar and Zebulun are children from one mother, seat yourselves to eat according to your births. And he also placed the others according to their births, and he said, I know that this your youngest brother has no brother, and I, like him, have no brother, he shall therefore sit down to eat with me.” (Jasher 53:10-13)

“At that time Joseph commanded his officer to fill their sacks with food, and to put each man's money into his sack, and to put the cup in the sack of Benjamin, and to give them provision for the road, and they did so unto them.” (Jasher 53:23)

Josephus’ Account

“Now when after supper they had composed themselves to sleep, Joseph commanded his steward both to give them their measures of corn, and to hide its price again in their sacks; and that withal they should put into Benjamin’s sack the golden cup, out of which he loved himself to drink.” (Flavius Josephus Chapter 6 How Joseph, When He Was Become Famous In Egypt, Had His Brothern In Subjection, part 7 number 124)

Concluding the Matter

As we can see from the four witnesses, Joseph was merely playing the part. He purposely had the cup placed in Benjamin’s sack, and thus did not need to use divination to know who stole something. This example does highlight something of great importance, too many, too often, read a verse in isolation and do not investigate the matter. In this case, reading the beginning of the chapter would have clarified the issue. Spending more time researching and studying the scriptures would do us all some good. Not passively skimming through, but truly taking the time and making the effort to learn the Set-apart scriptures. May the Rauch Hakodesh lead you into all truth.

P.S.

Check out some of my books! Available in both print and Kindle versions.  

The Link Between the Lost Tribes of Israel and the People of Wales: An Unexpected Discovery

 

It’s remarkable the kind of information one can come across when doing some research. Investigating one topic can, and in this case, lead to an unexpected area. One that I never even thought to question. I do not remember how I came to explore the possibility of King Arthur being a real historical figure. I do, however, recall in college taking an origin of medieval Britain class, and the professor stating that King Arthur was more than likely the son of a retired Roman soldier who held off Saxon invasions. My findings on King Arthur are for another time, but it was during this that I uncovered both primary and secondary sources attesting that the people of Wales belong to one of the lost ten tribes of Israel. 

From Assyrian Captivity to Troy and the British Isles 

This may sound preposterous, but it could be a possibility, and I believe the records make for a persuasive argument. Alan Wilson contends that some of the Israelites, to what capacity is unknown, were relocated to the city of Troy following the Assyrian captivity. 

“And the sovereign of Ashshur (Assyria) went through all the land, and went up to Shomeron (Samaria) and besieged it for three years. In the ninth year of Hoshĕa, the sovereign of Ashshur (Assyria) captured Shomeron (Samaria) and exiled Yisra’ĕl (Israel) to Ashshur (Assyria), and settled them in Ḥalaḥ and Ḥaḇor, the River of Gozan, and in the cities of the Medes.” (2 Kings 17:5-6)

Some researchers/ historians support the idea that it is likely that, following the fall of Troy, the occupants of the city fled to the Island of Britain. The man who led the refugees was none other than Brutus of Troy, who, according to legend, became the first King of Britain. It is from Brutus that the Island supposedly got its name, and is the reason why the people became known as Britons. Historian Bernard Jones, in his book The Discovery of Troy and its Lost History, details why he believes, among other things, that there is historical evidence that the British people, in part, are descendants of the Trojans. 

If it’s possible that a portion of the tribes of Israel was sent to Troy following their captivity, then it might be the case that some of them traveled with Brutus to Britain. Humor me, if you will, and let’s say they were because the following information leads me to believe there might be some validity to these claims. 

Early Conversion of the Celtics 

The people who lived in Wales before and after the Roman occupation of Britannia (Britain) were known as the Celts. You may be familiar with them, and I have spoken of them in my post “Pagan Holidays, Halloween.” It appears to be the case that the Celtics had a blended form of religion, utilizing Druidism and Biblical themes. 

“Welsh were Gnostic Christians from around 58 A.D.” (Wilson, Alan, and A. T. Blackett. Artorius Rex Discovered. Cardiff: King Arthur Research, 1986. Pg.8)

58 AD or CE is very early on and vastly sooner than the time of St. Augustine’s arrival, who is credited with converting the island to Catholicism. Wilson and Blackett’s statements are supported by the Old English Chronicles.

“Meanwhile these islands…received the beams of light…that is…Christ…at the latter part, as we know, of the reign of Tiberius Caesar.” (Giles, J. A. Six Old English Chronicles, of Which Two Are Now First Translated from the Monkish Latin Originals: Ethelwerd's Chronicle, Asser's Life of Alfred, Geoffrey of Monmouth's British History, Gildas, Nennius, and Richard of Cirencester. London: George Bell & Sons, 1882. Pg. 302)

Tiberius reigned from 14 CE to 37 CE, Yeshua was crucified in the year 33 CE.  That leaves just 5 years from the time of Yeshua’s ascension back into Heaven and the end of Tiberius’ reign. It is speculated that either Paul or Peter, if not both, went to Britain to spread the good news. That’s quite a journey and seems rather expedited as well. For Yeshua told his disciples to,

Yeshua sent these twelve out, having commanded them, saying, “Do not go into the way of the nations, and do not enter a city of the Shomeronim, but rather go to the lost sheep of the house of Yisra’ĕl (Israel).” (Matthew 10:5-6)

 They were first to go to where the lost sheep of the house of Israel were. This is a bit problematic, as no one knows if they belong to one of the lost ten tribes, at least not now. It could be, however, that the disciples knew of possible locations where the tribes could have been scattered, thus their reason to travel to the British Isles so soon.

The Hebraic Traditions followed by the Celtic Church 

According to historical records, the Celtic Church fervently resisted the Catholic Church’s attempts to convert the people. It appears the early Celtic Church had strong ties to Torah, which could be due to Peter and Paul teaching them the way.

“Biblical Law began to be introduced into the civil realm. In 432 Patrick wrote Liber Ex Lege Moisi (Book of the Law of Moses), which was applied by local chieftains or kings throughout Ireland.” (The Origin of Common Law, in America’s Providential History by Mark Beliles & Stephen McDowell p.39-41)

Having been taught the true way to follow the Messiah, the Celtic people started to keep Torah as they sought to be imitators of Yeshua. 

“The shared elements include the keeping of the Saturday Sabbath, tithing, the definition of "first fruits'' and offerings, the establishment of walled precincts for the priestly/monastic families, inheritance of religious office, and fasting and dietary restrictions…Other scholarship suggests that Irish Churchmen of the seventh and eighth centuries actually considered themselves to be Priests and Levites, as defined under Old Testament law.” (Leslie Hardinge "The Celtic Church in Britain", London, 1972, quoted and summarised by Deborah K. E. Crawford, "St. Joseph In Britain: Reconsidering The Legends. Part 2", Folklore 105 (1994): 51-59)

“...the prominence of Hebrew features in Irish canon law collections (including Biblical cities of Refuge and Jubilee Years) together with Mosaic prohibitions on diet and injunctions on tithes...There was also a Hebrew treatment of the sanctuary ...and finally there were many Hebrew words occurring in cryptographic monastic Irish works such as Hisperica Famina.” (Mrs. Winthrop Palmer Boswell, "The Roots of Irish Monasticism", California, 1969.)

“Mosaic parallelisms found amongst early Celtic Christians include the prohibition of sex in the menstrual period and after birth, also ritual animal slaughter was kept, and usury was prohibited…Old Testament Biblical injunctions were generally regarded as binding... Members of the Celtic Church were suspected by the Roman Catholics of Judaizing and its members in Scotland were accused of really being Jews.” (Baigent, Leigh, & Lincoln. "The Messianic Legacy", 1986, 1987 U.K.) Though if the Celtics were part of the house of Israel, they would not be Jews but Hebrews, for further clarification check out “Israel and Judah”. 

An Intriguing Possibility 

If all of this is true, that some portions of the lost tribes were sent to Troy and then left with Brutus to settle the British Isles, that Peter and Paul traveled to the Isles because they knew some lost sheep from the house of Israel lived there, and following Peter and Paul’s visit the Celtic people remember who they were and started to follow Yeshua Messiah in Torah obedience. Then it does cause one to wonder why the official history is taught so differently from what actually happened. 

Acts Chapter 29

After reading that subheading, you might have opened up your Bible to discover that Acts stops at chapter 28 (unless you're using the Cepher version of the Bible). However, in recent years, a document was found containing the 29th chapter of Acts. Known as the Sonnini Manuscript, named after Charles Nicolas Sigisbert Sonnini de Manoncourt, a French nobleman and naturalist who was raised in Jesuit education. Acts 29 was found with his other writings detailing his journeys in Greece and the Ottoman Empire in modern-day Turkey, along with a document from the Sultan allowing Sonnini to travel in the Ottoman Empire. Sonnini’s copy of Acts 29 came from an ‘original’ Greek version of Acts 29 that was housed in the Archives at Constantinople (modern-day Istanbul). 

The major thing I want to go over, and why it applies to this article, is that Acts 29 details Paul’s journey to the British Isles to visit with the druids. These people, Paul claimed to be a member of the lost sheep of the House of Israel, corroborating the aforementioned sources.  

“And Paulos, full of the blessings of Mashiach, and abounding in the spirit, departed out of Rome, determining to go into Spain, for he had a long time proposed to journey thitherward, and was minded also to go from thence to Britain. For he had heard on Phoenicia that certain of the children Yisrael, about the time of the Assyrian captivity, had escaped by sea to "The Isles afar off" as spoken of by the Prophet (Esdras), and called by the Romans – Britain. And the Adonai commanded the Good News to be Proclaimed far hence to the Gentiles (nations), and to the Lost Sheep of the House of Yisrael.” (Acts 29:1-3)

 This is the exact mission Yeshua gave his disciples, and Paul, to go out to those who had been divorced, the House of Israel, and let them know that a way was made for redemption (Redeeming the Bride, Israel and Judah). And as this message spread across the land, even those of gentile birth would hear the good news, and so be given a chance to enter into covenant with Yah Elohim.    

“And they departed out of Spain, and Paulos and his company, finding a ship in Armorica sailing to Britain, they were therein, and passing along the south coast, they reached a port called Raphinus. Now, when it was voiced abroad that the apostle had landed on their coast, great multitudes of the inhabitants met him, and they treated Paulos courteously, and he entered in at the east gate of their city, and lodged in the house of an Hebrew and one of his own nation (tribe).”  (Acts 29:7-8)

Paul came from the tribe of Benjamin, which belongs to the House of Judah, informing us that both houses occupied land in Britain. Perhaps this is how Paul knew that some of the lost sheep of the House of Israel lived on the island? After delivering the message of the Kingdom, the druids came to speak with Paul face-to-face.

“And it shall come to pass that certain of the Druids came to Paulos privately, and showed by their rites and ceremonies that they were descended from Yehudim (from the tribe of Judah) which escaped from bondage in the land of Mitzrayim (Egypt), and the apostle believed these things, and he gave them the kiss of Shalom.” (Acts 29:13)

This makes the Druids distinct from those who arrived in Britain following Assyrian captivity, as the House of Judah was not taken by them, and the Druids point to leaving Egypt as their branching off moment. Are they the descendants of Zerah from the tribe of Judah who left the rest of Israel soon after the Exodus from Egypt? Is it possible that they moved to Greece, Troy, Gaul, before finally settling in Britannia? Whatever the case, they felt the need to prove to Paul that they were, in fact, from that line (tribe of Judah), and after witnessing their rites and ceremonies, Paul had concluded that they were telling the truth. 

All of this is rather exciting, as I feel there is something extremely important concerning the British Isles and Israel. It became the habitation for both Judah and Israel, and that’s not by coincidence, but why?  What mysteries are still waiting to be revealed? What piece(s) of history, long forgotten or hidden, are waiting to be (re)discovered?    

I hope this has sparked some interest in researching the matter for yourself. Continue to test all things, and may the Ruach Hakodesh lead you into all Truths.      

P.S.

Check out some of my books! Available in both print and Kindle versions.